Table 1.
Quality of the included studies based on the Newcastle–Ottawa scale
Studies | Selection
|
Comparability | Outcome
|
Total score | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Representativeness of the exposed cohort | Selection of the nonexposed cohort | Assessment of exposure | Outcome not present at start of study | Assessment of outcome | Follow-up long enough for outcomes | Adequacy of follow-up | |||
Zhou et al18 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
Yu et al26 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
Zhang19 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Ahn et al30 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 |
Zhang et al27 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 |
Zhang et al28 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Pan et al29 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
Notes:
A study can be awarded a maximum of one point for each numbered item within the “Selection” and “Outcome” categories, and a maximum of two points can be given for “Comparability”.