Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 10;16(2):317–324. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2014.1002360

Table 3.

Association relationship between hub genes with survival

  Training data set (n = 87)
Validating dataset (n = 449)
  DMFS
DMFS
RFS
Gene HR p-value 95% CI HR p-value 95% CI HR p-value 95% CI
CDK1 2.92 8.5 × 10–3 1.31–6.49 3.07 3.0 × 10–5 1.81–5.21 2.13 1.3 × 10–5 1.52–3.00
DEPDC1 3.34 4.1 × 10–3 1.47–7.62 0.93 7.9 × 10–1 0.54–1.58 0.98 8.9 V 10–1 0.71–1.35
DLGAP5 2.86 9.9 × 10–3 1.29–6.35 1.98 7.8 × 10–3 1.20–3.26 1.77 8.2 × 10–4 1.27–2.47
MELK 3.52 2.4 × 10–3 1.54–8.05 2.55 2.9 × 10–4 1.54–4.24 1.97 8.9 × 10–5 1.40–2.77
NUSAP1 2.97 7.6 × 10–3 1.34–6.62 2.35 9.2 × 10–4 1.42–3.89 1.43 3.6 × 10–2 1.02–1.99
RRM2 2.86 9.8 × 10–3 1.29–6.36 1.85 1.6 × 10–2 1.12–3.06 2.04 3.9 × 10–5 1.45–2.86

Recurrence free survival (RFS), Distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after grouped the breast cancer patients by the median of gene level.