Skip to main content
. 2015 Mar 10;16(2):317–324. doi: 10.1080/15384047.2014.1002360

Table 4.

Association relationship between hub genes with survival within breast cancer molecular subtypes

  Training data set (n = 87)
Validating dataset (n = 449)
  DMFS
DMFS
RFS
  luminal A
luminal B
luminal A
luminal B
luminal A
Luminal B
Gene HR p-value HR p-value HR p-value HR p-value HR p-value HR p-value
CDK1 0.90 8.6 × 10–1 1.83 2.8 × 10–1 1.50 3.6 × 10–1 1.84 5.9 × 10–2 1.52 1.0 × 10–1 1.76 1.6 × 10–2
DLGAP5 1.74 3.5 × 10–1 2.80 8.2 × 10–2 1.44 4.0 × 10–1 0.91 7.8 × 10–1 1.61 6.7 × 10–2 1.08 7.3 × 10–1
MELK 1.88 2.8 × 10–1 2.60 9.0 × 10–2 2.70 2.8 × 10–2 2.04 2.8 × 10–2 2.13 5.4 × 10–3 1.91 6.4 × 10–3
NUSAP1 1.25 7.0 × 10–1 2.88 7.5 × 10–2 2.23 7.0 × 10–2 1.12 7.2 × 10–1 1.50 1.2 × 10–1 0.92 7.0 × 10–1
RRM2 1.09 8.9 × 10–1 1.16 7.9 × 10–2 1.41 4.4 × 10–1 1.08 8.1 × 10–1 1.91 1.4 × 10–2 1.22 3.8 × 10–2

Recurrence free survival (RFS), Distant metastasis free survival (DMFS). Hazard ratios (HRs), 95% confidence intervals (CI), and p-values were calculated using Cox proportional hazards regression analysis after grouped the breast cancer patients by the median of gene level.