Skip to main content
. 2015 May 21;10(6):526–535. doi: 10.1080/15592294.2015.1048060

Table 1.

Demographic information for all samples used in this study

  AML
 
  CHARM cohort Additional validation samples Normal
  (n = 15) (n = 13) (n = 15)
Gender [Number of males (%)] 11 (73%) 4 (31%) 7 (47%)
Age (median, range)1 38 (18–62) 59 (20–71) 42 (23–64)
Cytogenetic risk      
Low2 30 (24–60, n = 5) 68 (20–71, n = 3) -
Mid 38 (18–62, n = 5) 59 (48–70, n = 5) -
High3 45 (18–58, n = 5) 49 (21–64, n = 5) -
Blast percentage (median, range) 77% (39%-96%) 88% (17%-99%)  
1.

Samples were age matched within the CHARM cohort (P = 0.94 by Kruskal-Wallis test) and additional validation cohort (P = 0.53).

2.

Low-risk AML was defined as patients with t(8;21) or inv(16);

3.

High-risk AML patients in this study all had complex karyotype.