Table 3.
Author, Year | Research Question | Random-ization | Conceal-ment | Blinding | Similarity at baseline | Similarity between arms | Outcome measure-ment | Percent drop-outa | Intention to treat | Results comparable between sites |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Bergman et al., 2004 [40] | Y | CS | Y | Y | Nb | Y | Y | 12 weeks (immediately post-intervention) | Y | CS |
UC = 14 % | ||||||||||
MT + UC = 13 % | ||||||||||
26 weeks: | ||||||||||
UC = 11 % | ||||||||||
UC + MT = 9 % | ||||||||||
52 weeks: | ||||||||||
UC = 13 % | ||||||||||
MT + UC = 6 % | ||||||||||
Cook et al., 2014 [41] | Y | Y | N | Y | Y | CS | Y | Post-intervention: | N | CS |
Manipulation: 2/38 = 5 % | ||||||||||
Control: 4/36 = 11 % | ||||||||||
Cleland et al., 2013 [42] | Y | Y | Y | Y | Y | N | Y | 1 month: | Y | CS |
MTEX: 3/37 = 8 % | ||||||||||
HEP: 2/37 = 5 % |
Acronyms: Y Yes, N No, CS Can’t Say, NA Not Applicable, MT Manual therapy, UC Usual Care, MTEX manual therapy and home exercise, HEP Home exercise program
aPercent drop-out includes drop-outs and loss to follow-up
bBaseline differences were adjusted in the analysis