Figure - PMC

Skip to main content

View full-text article in PMC

. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.

Published in final edited form as: Pediatr Radiol. 2015 Jul 4;45(12):1771–1780. doi: 10.1007/s00247-015-3400-2

Fig. 4 — Comparison of liver-dose results. a Plot of CTDI_vol-normalized liver-dose relationship with body circumference as compared to findings of Turner et al. [28] (dashed line) for abdominopelvic study (120 kVp, body bowtie filter, pitch 1.0 and collimation 28.8–40 mm). Data normalized to CTDI_vol from 32-cm-diameter phantom. b Plot of exponential fit of CTDI_vol-normalized liver dose to abdominopelvic diameter as compared to data from Tian et al. [24] (dashed line) for abdominopelvic study (120 kVp, small bowtie filter, pitch 1.375, 40-mm collimation)

Fig. 4 — Comparison of liver-dose results. a Plot of CTDI_vol-normalized liver-dose relationship with body circumference as compared to findings of Turner et al. [28] (dashed line) for abdominopelvic study (120 kVp, body bowtie filter, pitch 1.0 and collimation 28.8–40 mm). Data normalized to CTDI_vol from 32-cm-diameter phantom. b Plot of exponential fit of CTDI_vol-normalized liver dose to abdominopelvic diameter as compared to data from Tian et al. [24] (dashed line) for abdominopelvic study (120 kVp, small bowtie filter, pitch 1.375, 40-mm collimation)