Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 29;9(9):1868–1876. doi: 10.1016/j.molonc.2015.07.002

Table 3.

SNPs with possible discordance >10% in FFPE‐T.

Study label Gene rsID # FFPE‐T strict discordant calls # FFPE‐T no‐calls # blood no‐calls Possible discordancea
4E VEGFC rs1485766 1 8 3 10.5%
6O ESR1 rs2046210 5 7 1 11.4%
6T ESR1 rs3853250 3 8 1 10.5%
6Z ESR1 rs1709181 4 8 1 11.4%
6BD OPRM1 rs1799971 1 70 0 62.3%
7A Intergenic rs2097903 2 10 0 10.5%
7F ABCB1 rs2032582 2 15 3 17.5%
7G CYP3A rs10273424 0 27 1 24.6%
9A SLC28A3 rs7853758 0 44 2 40.4%
10M CYP2C8 rs11188172 0 25 1 22.8%
10Q CYP17A1 rs4919687 0 12 0 10.5%
11Bb PGR rs500760 6 6 0 10.5%
12M NCOR2 rs1812730 1 10 1 10.5%
13J HTR2A rs6311 2 18 4 21.1%
13L SLC10A2 rs2301159 3 7 3 11.4%
14I ESR2 rs1952585 1 18 1 17.5%
14R AKT1 rs2494732 3 10 5 15.8%
15Eb CYP19A1 rs9806371 11 22 2 30.7%
15S CYP19A1 rs730154 0 10 2 10.5%
15U CYP19A1 rs4774585 2 5 5 10.5%
16D SPG7 rs12960 4 10 0 12.3%
17A PELP1 rs9436 2 11 0 11.4%
22D COMT rs6269 1 12 0 11.4%
22Eb COMT rs4633 8 6 0 12.3%
22F COMT rs4818 3 10 0 11.4%
22L EP300 rs20551 1 8 5 12.3%
22Q NDUFA6 rs1801311 4 10 0 12.3%
22R CYP2D6 rs28371738 1 13 5 16.7%
a

Calculated as: # of strict discordant calls + FFPE‐T no‐calls + blood no‐calls/number of patients (n = 114).

b

Also failed due to strict discordance >5% in FFPE‐T (Table 2).