Table 2.

Comparison of different secondary structure prediction methods with the method used routinely in this study SOPMA

Name	SOPMA	PsiPred	JPred3	I-TASSER	CONCORD
Pam18 (66–83)	17	100	50	89	83
Pam18 (120–137)	83	67	61	67	67
Pam18 (151–168)	72	78	78	61	72
Pam16 (5–22)	56	100	45	100	100
Pam16 (92–109)	61	72	50	83	83
Pam16 (107–124)	94	89	40	94	94
Pam17 (4–21)	56	72	28	22	50
Pam17 (52–69)	56	100	100	100	100
Pam17 (87–104)	61	78	100	100	100
Pam17 (112–129)	83	94	78	100	100
Pam17 (163–180)	78	100	100	100	100
Tim44 (83–100)	89	83	100	100	78
Tim44 (94–110)	61	100	100	100	83
Tim44 (126–143)	83	100	83	100	100
Tim44 (180–197)	67	50	50	55	56
Tim44 (217–235)	61	72	67	94	67
Tim44 (226–243)	78	56	72	94	72
Tim44 (301–318)	83	78	78	83	89

Indicated values are the α-helical content (in %)