Table 13.
Number of studies | Design | Limitation | Inconsistency | Indirectness | Imprecision | Publication bias | Other considerations | Quality |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Pain after treatment | ||||||||
3 | RCT | Serious limitationa | Serious inconsistencyb | Serious indirectnessb | Serious imprecisionb | Undetected | None | – |
Function after treatment | ||||||||
3 | RCT | Serious limitationa | No serious inconsistencyc | No serious indirectness | No serious imprecision | Undetected | None | Moderate |
One study had both unclear random sequence generation and allocation concealment. Two studies had no intention-to-treat analysis.
One study did not have pain score but had the WOMAC index that has a subscale of the pain scale. Two studies had decreased pain scale with significant differences.
Two studies had improved function without significant differences and one with significant differences.