Table 3.

Correlation between Cell Number and CR Amplitude

ECC Task	Region	Diet	Alcohol, g/Kg	Correlation coefficient	Slope*
Delay	IPN	Pooled	Pooled	0.871†	8.31 x 10−4
		IS	Pooled	0.835†	8.06 x 10−4
			0	0.846†	9.13 x 10−4
			3.5	0.635†	4.70 x 10−4
			5	0.762†	1.29 x 10−3
		ID	Pooled	0.873†	8.15 x 10−4
			0	0.713†	5.41 x 10−4
			3.5	0.806†	8.14 x 10−4
			5	0.879†	9.16 x 10−4
	CA1	Pooled	Pooled	0.792†	3.59 x 10−5
		IS	Pooled	0.741†	2.87 x 10−5
			0	0.622†	2.30 x 10−5
			3.5	0.587	1.62 x 10−5
			5	0.673†	2.77 x 10−5
		ID	Pooled	0.810†	4.13 x 10−5
			0	0.783†	4.43 x 10−5
			3.5	0.757†	3.37 x 10−5
			5	0.547	2.02 x 10−5
Trace	IPN	Pooled	Pooled	0.703†	2.79 x 10−4
		IS	Pooled	0.735†	2.78 x 10−4
			0	0.968†	3.27 x 10−4
			3.5	0.447	1.72 x 10−4
			5	0.593	9.79 x 10−5
		ID	Pooled	0.622†	2.67 x 10−4
			0	0.407	2.43 x 10−4
			3.5	0.517	2.04 x 10−4
			5	0.118	1.18 x 10−5
	CA1	Pooled	Pooled	0.846†	1.53 x 10−5
		IS	Pooled	0.856†	1.50 x 10−5
			0	0.861†	1.59 x 10−5
			3.5	0.736†	1.35 x 10−5
			5	0.693†	6.72 x 10−6
		ID	Pooled	0.821†	1.49 x 10−5
			0	0.849†	1.11 x 10−5
			3.5	0.710†	1.02 x 10−5
			5	0.722†	3.29 x 10−6

^*Slopes did not differ as determined by analysis of covariance.

^†Indicates Pearson’s correlation coefficients for which p < 0.05