Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 27;10(10):e0140899. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140899

Table 3. Results from between-study meta-regression.

Fecal indicator bacteria (>1 CFU/100mL) Total coliforms (>1 CFU/100mL)
Variables Obs OR (95% CI) p-value Obs OR (95% CI) p-value
PW type
Small bottles vs. all other PW types 157 0.32 (0.17–0.58) <0.001* 170 0.10 (0.05–0.22) <0.001*
Small bottles vs. all sachets 137 0.21 (0.10–0.42) <0.001* 147 0.04 (0.02–0.09) <0.001*
Small bottles vs. machine- filled sachet 129 0.31 (0.16–0.62) 0.001* 139 0.08 (0.03–0.17) <0.001*
Machine-filled sachet vs. hand-filled sachet 45 0.10 (0.02–0.53) 0.008* 44 0.04 (0.01–0.26) 0.001*
Study location
LICs vs. UM/HICs 157 4.6 (2.6–8.1) <0.001* 170 13.6 (6.9–26.7) <0.001*
Africa vs. all other regions 157 3.0 (1.6–5.5) 0.001* 170 10.7 (5.1–22.6) <0.001*
Asia vs. all other regions 157 1.7 (0.78–3.5) 0.192 170 0.94 (0.38–2.3) 0.889
South America vs. all other regions 157 0.71 (0.35–1.5) 0.350 170 0.40 (0.16–0.97) 0.044*
Developed vs. all other regions 157 0.12 (0.05–0.27) <0.001* 170 0.08 (0.03–0.22) <0.001*
Study characteristics
Random vs. nonrandom 157 1.1 (0.59–2.2) 0.700 170 2.3 (1.0–5.2) 0.041*
Representative vs. non-representative 157 0.79 (0.36–1.7) 0.551 170 1.3 (0.47–3.5) 0.629
Longitudinal vs. cross-sectional 153 0.81 (0.32–2.0) 0.646 164 1.4 (0.38–5.2) 0.616
High quality vs. low-quality 157 0.99 (0.44–2.3) 0.988 170 2.1 (0.70–6.6) 0.178
E. coli vs. TTC 157 0.82 (0.44–1.5) 0.536

*significance at 95%