Table 4.
The prediction accuracies (%) using the top tagSNPs and randomly selected tagSNPs for the inbred lines and hybrids
| SNP number | Prediction | 2009 (Yaan) | 2009 (Kunming) | 2009 (Sanya) | 2010 (Kunming) | 2010 (Wuhan) | BLUP |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 17 | Strategy 1 for Panel 1 | 53 | 60 | 59 | 48 | 49 | 57 |
| Strategy 1 for Hybrids | 64 | 65 | 69 | 59 | 64 | 68 | |
| Strategy 2 for Panel 1 | 9 | 10 | 15 | 9 | 14 | 13 | |
| 300 | Strategy 1 for Panel 1 | 73 | 71 | 78 | 66 | 70 | 77 |
| Strategy 1 for Hybrids | 71 | 69 | 67 | 75 | 69 | 71 | |
| Strategy 2 for Panel 1 | 27 | 26 | 33 | 22 | 31 | 31 | |
| 1 K | Strategy 1 for Panel 1 | 73 | 72 | 78 | 68 | 73 | 78 |
| Strategy 1 for Hybrids | 73 | 71 | 72 | 71 | 74 | 73 | |
| Strategy 2 for Panel 1 | 31 | 29 | 37 | 27 | 35 | 35 | |
| 10 K | Strategy 1 for Panel 1 | 68 | 66 | 72 | 61 | 68 | 73 |
| Strategy 1 for Hybrids | 73 | 69 | 73 | 77 | 75 | 77 | |
| Strategy 2 for Panel 1 | 46 | 44 | 50 | 40 | 47 | 50 | |
| 20 K | Strategy 1 for Panel 1 | 56 | 54 | 61 | 49 | 58 | 61 |
| Strategy 1 for Hybrids | 75 | 70 | 72 | 76 | 74 | 77 | |
| Strategy 2 for Panel 1 | 45 | 43 | 50 | 41 | 47 | 50 | |
| 24 K | Strategy 1 for Panel 1 | 56 | 53 | 61 | 49 | 57 | 60 |
| Strategy 1 for Hybrids | 73 | 70 | 72 | 76 | 74 | 78 | |
| Strategy 2 for Panel 1 | 55 | 53 | 61 | 49 | 57 | 61 |
Strategy 1 for Panel 1: using the top tagSNPs to predict the inbred lines in Panel 1; Strategy 1 for Hybrids: using the top tagSNPs to predict the hybrids; Strategy 2 for Panel 1: using the randomly selected tagSNPs to predict the inbred lines in Panel 1