Skip to main content
. 2014 Oct 22;79(6):899–912. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0621-1

Table 3.

Sequential modulation of the FCE

Effect RT % Errors
F(1,24) p F(1,24) p
Flanker condition 81.2 <0.01 <1 >0.62
Transition 119.0 <0.01 25.4 <0.01
Congruency n − 1 1.7 >0.20 3.6 =0.07
Congruency n 41.7 <0.01 18.5 <0.01
Flanker cond. × transition 4.3 <0.05 <1 >0.46
Flanker cond. × congruency n − 1 14.2 <0.01 1.7 >0.20
Flanker cond. × congruency n 15.8 <0.01 6.3 <0.05
Transition × congruency n – 1 <1 >0.35 <1 >0.32
Transition × congruency n 14.2 <0.01 4.1 >0.05
Congruency n − 1 × congruency n (Gratton effect) 12.8 <0.01 11.3 <0.01
Flanker cond. × transition × congruency n − 1 <1 >0.37 < 1 >0.86
Flanker cond. × transition × congruency n <1 >0.35 5.7 <0.05
Flanker cond. × congruency n − 1 × congruency n <1 >0.44 2.9 >0.09
Transition × congruency n − 1 × congruency n 23.0 <0.01 <1 >0.44
Flanker cond. × transition × congruency n − 1 × congruency n 1.9 >0.18 1.02 >0.32

The table shows the results of the 2 (flanker condition: applied, instructed) × 2 (target/response transition: repetition, alternation) × 2 (congruency on trial n − 1) × 2 (congruency on trial n) repeated measures ANOVAs for RTs and % errors

Relevant interactions involving the Gratton effect are in bold