Skip to main content
. 2015 Oct 3;9:574–580. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2015.10.002

Table 1.

Spearman rank correlation coefficients between MR measures and clinical scores.


Brain
Volume
Brain
VFM
Spinal cord Volume
Spinal cord
VFM
vCSF Corpus callosum CCV Whole cervical cord
EDSS R = 0.23, p = 0.4 R = − 0.50, p = 0.06 R = − 0.47, p = 0.08 R = − 0.53, p = 0.04
MSFC R = − 0.73, p = 0.002 R = 0.46, p = 0.09 R = 0.45, p = 0.09 R = 0.57, p = 0.03
PASAT R = − 0.65, p = 0.009 R = 0.11, p = 0.7 R = 0.16, p = 0.6 R = 0.33, p = 0.2
9HPT R = − 0.67, p = 0.007 R = 0.64, p = 0.01 R = 0.11, p = 0.7 R = 0.49, p = 0.06
T25FW R = 0.08, p = 0.8 R = − 0.40, p = 0.1 R = − 0.54, p = 0.04 R = − 0.53, p = 0.04

Significant relationships (p < 0.05) indicated in bold, and trends (p = 0.06) in italics.

9HPT was measured as the average of the inverse of the time for the dominant hand and the inverse of the time for the non-dominant hand (thus 9HPT score decreases for longer times), and T25FW was measured as the average time over 2 attempts (thus T25FW score increases for longer times).