Table 6.
Proximity Score | Doctor A | Doctor B | Doctor C | Doctor D | Doctor E |
Marginalization | 1.61 | 1.61 | 1.64 | 2.41 | 2.57 |
Separation | 2.77 | 2.26 | 3.64 | 2.30 | 2.45 |
Assimilation | 1.38 | 1.20 | 0.61 | 1.89 | 1.67 |
Integration | 2.39 | 1.74 | 1.64 | 1.81 | 1.59 |
Proximity Score | Patient A | Patient B | Patient C | Patient D | Patient E |
Marginalization | 1.89 | 1.81 | 1.70 | 1.41 | 1.70 |
Separation | 2.41 | 1.89 | 2.38 | 2 | 2.38 |
Assimilation | 1.81 | 2.29 | 1.78 | 2 | 1.78 |
Integration | 2.31 | 2.42 | 2.50 | 2.82 | 2.50 |
As can be seen above, Doctor and Patient A are the only pair who have a combination of acculturation orientations that match to provide consensual relationships as predicted by the health practitioner/health consumer model. The other four doctor/patient pairs show orientation combinations that lead to conflictual/problematic relationships according to the health practitioner/health consumer model