Skip to main content
. 2015 Jun 4;26(11):2821–2829. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014121233

Table 1.

Demographic characteristics in melamine tableware manufacturing workers by worksites and their comparison group

Variables Exposed Workers (n=44) Nonexposed workers Controls (N=105) P valuea (Overall) P valueb(Manufacturers versus Controls)
Manufacturers (N=16) Grinders (N=8) Packers (N=10) Administrators (N=10)
N (%)
 Factory
  A 7 4 4 8
  B 9 4 6 2
 Gender
  Male 12 (75.0) 3 (37.0) 2 (20.0) 4 (40.0) 97 (92.0) <0.001 0.053
  Female 4 (25.0) 5 (62.0) 8 (80.0) 6 (60.0) 8 (8.0)
 Education (year)
  ≤9 12 (75.0) 5 (63.0) 6 (60.0) 2 (20.0) 2 (2.0) <0.001 <0.001
  >9 4 (25.0) 3 (38.0) 4 (40.0) 8 (80.0) 103 (98.0)
 Personal habits
  Current smokers 4 (25.0) 2 (25.0) 1 (10.0) 2 (20.0) 13 (12.4) 0.580 0.164
  Current betel chewers 2 (12.5) 0 0 0 6 (5.7) 0.523 0.285
  Current drinkers 4 (25.0) 1 (12.5) 1 (10.0) 3 (30.0) 50 (47.6) 0.029 0.075
Mean±SD (median, IQR)
 Age (years) 47.3±6.2 43.9±8.43 38.4±9.9 36.5±8.5 48.8±9.0 <0.001 0.119
(49.0, 40.8–52.5) (48.0, 34.0–50.8) (38.5, 29.8–48.5) (34.0, 30.3–42.0) (51.0, 48.0–55.0)
 Year of employment (years) 18.0±11.7 6.9±9.0 7.1±6.1 8.9±5.3 0.014
(18.0, 7.0–26.0) (2.5, 1.0–10.0) (5.5, 1.8–14.3) (10.0, 3.5–12.3)
 BMI 23.1±4.5 22.6±3.4 22.5±2.5 25.4±7.1 23.7±2.7 0.482 0.603
(23.7, 20.0–25.4) (21.7, 19.7–4.9) (22.3, 20.8–23.9) (22.6, 20.8–29.4) (23.2, 22.0–25.5)
 WHR 0.9±0.1 0.8±0.1 0.8±0.0 0.9±0.1 1.6±7.2 0.058 1.000
(0.9, 0.8–0.9) (0.8, 0.8–0.9) (0.8, 0.8–0.9) (0.8, 0.8–0.9) (0.9, 0.8–0.9)

IQR, interquartile range; BMI, body mass index; WHR, waist-to-hip ratio.

a

Kruskal–Wallis test or chi-squared test.

b

Wilcoxon rank-sum test or Fisher’s exact test.