Table 6.
Unit | Organism and antibiotic | Pre-intervention | Post-intervention | p-value |
---|---|---|---|---|
TNICU | ||||
E. coli | ||||
ampicillin | 42/83 (51) | 40/76 (53) | 0.80 | |
cefazolin | 70/83 (84) | 61/76 (80) | 0.50 | |
cefotaxime | 72/83 (87) | 64/76 (84) | 0.65 | |
ciprofloxacin | 68/83 (82) | 60/76 (79) | 0.64 | |
TMP-SMX | 66/83 (80) | 61/76 (80) | 0.91 | |
piperacillin-tazobactam | 70/83 (84) | 63/76 (83) | 0.81 | |
imipenem | 85/85 (100) | 76/77 (99) | 0.48a | |
gentamicin | 77/83 (93) | 70/76 (92) | 0.87 | |
tobramycin | 76/83 (92) | 70/76 (92) | 0.90 | |
P. aeruginosa | ||||
ceftazidime | 27/30 (90) | 22/23 (96) | 0.62a | |
ciprofloxacin | 27/30 (90) | 18/23 (78) | 0.27a | |
piperacillin-tazobactam | 27/30 (90) | 22/23 (96) | 0.62a | |
imipenem | 30/30 (100) | 20/23 (87) | 0.076a | |
gentamicin | 28/30 (93) | 23/23 (100) | 0.50a | |
tobramycin | 30/30 (100) | 23/23 (100) | - | |
MSICU | ||||
E. coli | ||||
ampicillin | 37/95 (39) | 30/81 (37) | 0.79 | |
cefazolin | 65/95 (68) | 59/81 (73) | 0.52 | |
cefotaxime | 73/95 (77) | 64/81 (79) | 0.73 | |
ciprofloxacin | 46/95 (48) | 49/81 (60) | 0.11 | |
TMP-SMX | 58/95 (61) | 43/81 (53) | 0.29 | |
piperacillin-tazobactam | 64/95 (67) | 59/80 (74) | 0.36 | |
imipenem | 93/95 (98) | 81/82 (99) | 1.00a | |
gentamicin | 76/95 (80) | 73/81 (90) | 0.063 | |
tobramycin | 72/95 (76) | 72/81 (89) | 0.025 | |
P. aeruginosa | ||||
ceftazidime | 50/64 (78) | 42/58 (72) | 0.46 | |
ciprofloxacin | 58/64 (91) | 41/58 (71) | 0.0049 | |
piperacillin-tazobactam | 50/64 (78) | 40/58 (69) | 0.25 | |
imipenem | 51/64 (80) | 41/58 (71) | 0.25 | |
gentamicin | 58/64 (91) | 48/58 (83) | 0.20 | |
tobramycin | 62/64 (97) | 56/58 (97) | 1.00a |
Data are number of isolates susceptible/total number of isolates tested (%). All p-values calculated using Chi-square unless otherwise noted. A Bonferroni corrected significance threshold of 0.0033 was used. TMP-SMX, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.
aFisher’s Exact test