Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 10.
Published in final edited form as: J Control Release. 2015 Sep 11;217:191–201. doi: 10.1016/j.jconrel.2015.09.005

Table 2.

Summary of experimentally-determined degradation kinetic time constants (kdeg).

Enzymatically-responsive hydrogel In vitro kdeg (dry mass, with 10 nM MMP2) (x10−2; hour−1) In vivo kdeg (fluorescence intensity) (x10−2; hour−1)
SPARC113(DL) 1.16 ± 0.03b,c 1.46 ± 0.12
SPARC118(DL) 8.77 ± 0.74a,c,2 1.44 ± 0.181
Scrambled(DL) 3.23 ± 0.13a,b,2 1.50 ± 0.241

Within degradation environment (columns), across gel type (rows):

a

p<0.05 vs. SPARC113(DL),

b

p<0.05 vs. SPARC118(DL),

c

p<0.05 vs. Scrambled(DL).

Within gel type (rows), across degradation environment (columns):

1

p<0.05 vs. in vitro,

2

p<0.05 vs. in vivo.

n=6 (in vitro) or 16 (in vivo); mean ± standard error of the mean.