Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 30.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2015 Jul 14;34(27):3590–3605. doi: 10.1002/sim.6577

Table 8.

Calibration Equationsa for Usual Intakes of Protein and Protein Density in Women, using FFQ-reported Protein and Protein Density, respectively

Protein Protein Density

Covariate Reg. coeff. (SE) p Reg. coeff. (SE) p
Intercept (weighted average of γT0h) 4.441 (0.115) 2.596 (0.118)
λQh: Study 1 0.132 (0.041) 0.419 (0.092)
    Study 2 0.039 (0.050) 0.528 (0.094)
    Study 3 0.149 (0.040) 0.425 (0.102)
    Study 4 0.191 (0.029) 0.426 (0.061)
    Study 5 0.162 (0.025) 0.412 (0.076)
    Weighted Average 0.152 (0.016) 0.436 (0.037)
                        Heterogeneity b 0.116 0.886
γT1:
Age: <40y v 50-59y 0.059 (0.034) 0.027 (0.035)
    40-49y v 50-59y 0.023 (0.027) −0.033 (0.029)
    60-69y v 50-59y 0.021 (0.030) <0.001 0.048 (0.032) 0.004
    70-79y v 50-59y −0.048 (0.034) 0.037 (0.036)
    >80y v 50-59y −0.177 (0.043) −0.051 (0.044)
log BMI 0.371 (0.035) <0.001 −0.012 (0.036) 0.744
Race: African American v Otherd −0.116 (0.019) <0.001 −0.072 (0.020) <0.001
Education: High school v College −0.030 (0.018) 0.067 −0.016 (0.018) 0.220
        Postgrad v College 0.014 (0.016) 0.018 (0.016)
                        Heterogeneity c 0.579 0.054
a

See Equation (7) in text

b

p-value for heterogeneity of adjusted “attenuation coefficient” for FFQ across studies

c

p-value for heterogeneity of regression coefficients for other covariates (γT1h) across studies

d

Other includes non-Hispanic whites