Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 30;473(12):3849–3857. doi: 10.1007/s11999-015-4479-3

Table 5.

Results of the multiple regression analysis showing the influence of gender on each of the PROMs at baseline while controlling for the covariates comorbidity, age, BMI, SF-12 MCS, and sociodemographic differences

Predictors OHS WOMAC total
B (95% CI) p value B p value
Gender −2.5 (−4.3 to −0.6) 0.008 −7.1 (−12.1 to −2.0) 0.006
Age −0.1 (−0.2 to 0.1) 0.274 −0.1 (−0.3 to 0.2) 0.743
BMI −0.3 (−0.5 to −0.1) 0.011 −0.9 (−1.5 to −0.3) 0.002
Number of comorbidities −1.0 (−1.8 to −0.2) 0.011 −3.1 (−5.2 to −1.0) 0.004
SF-12 MCS 0.2 (0.1–0.3) < 0.001 0.5 (0.3–0.8) < .001
High education versus lower education 0.1 (−2.2 to 2.3) 0.958 −1.8 (−7.9 to 4.3) 0.567
Living with partner versus living alone −1.1 (−2.8 to 0.7) 0.235 −1.0 (−5.9 to 3.9) 0.681
Full-time employed versus retired 0.5 (−1.7 to 2.7) 0.667 1.0 (−5.1 to 7.0) 0.759
Homeworker versus retired 1.4 (−1.3 to 4.2) 0.984 0.6 (−7-1 to 8.2) 0.887

PROMs = patient-reported outcome measures; BMI = body mass index; MCS = mental component summary; OHS = Oxford Hip Score.