Table 3.
Associations between urine BPA and female hormones *.
| Hormones | Model 1 | Model 2 | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Coefficient | p | Coefficient | p | |
| All participants | ||||
| FSH | −0.03 | 0.17 | −0.01 | 0.47 |
| LH | −0.006 | 0.79 | −0.005 | 0.81 |
| E2 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.01 | 0.20 |
| PRL | 0.04 | 0.009 | 0.04 | 0.02 |
| PROG | 0.15 | 0.002 | 0.11 | 0.01 |
| Among exposed group | ||||
| FSH | −0.03 | 0.38 | −0.03 | 0.38 |
| LH | 0.04 | 0.42 | 0.05 | 0.28 |
| E2 | 0.04 | 0.06 | 0.04 | 0.05 |
| PRL | 0.06 | 0.07 | 0.07 | 0.05 |
| PROG | 0.20 | 0.04 | 0.19 | 0.03 |
| Among unexposed group | ||||
| FSH | −0.10 | 0.001 | −0.07 | 0.006 |
| LH | −0.03 | 0.44 | −0.03 | 0.39 |
| E2 | 0.02 | 0.18 | 0.02 | 0.21 |
| PRL | 0.05 | 0.05 | 0.04 | 0.11 |
| PROG | 0.21 | 0.004 | 0.15 | 0.02 |
* linear regression; model 1: adjusted for age, passive smoking, and study center; model 2: adjusted for age, passive smoking, study center and menstrual phase (dummy variables).