Skip to main content
. 2015 Jul 28;138(10):2987–3002. doi: 10.1093/brain/awv212

Figure 6.

Figure 6

Diurnal fluctuations in dopamine metabolism. (A) Striatal TH activity was assessed in the early active period (8 pm) and early inactive period (8 am) in normal and DRD mice (n = 5–8/condition). There was a significant genotype × time interaction effect [F(1,21) = 25.8, P < 0.001], with normal mice exhibiting significantly more TH activity at 8 am than at 8 pm (P < 0.01) but no significant difference was observed between times of day in DRD mice (P > 0.1). (B) Striatal dopamine and (C) DOPAC concentrations, as well as (D) the DOPAC/dopamine ratio were assessed at 8 am and 8 pm (n = 6–9/condition). (B) For dopamine, there was a significant genotype × time interaction effect [F(1,23) = 23.6, P < 0.001], with the concentration of dopamine in normal mice significantly greater at 8 am than at 8 pm (P < 0.01) but no significant difference observed between times of day in DRD mice. (C) For DOPAC, there was a significant genotype × time interaction effect [F(1,23 = 4.6, P < 0.05], with the concentration of DOPAC in normal mice significantly greater at 8 am than at 8 pm (P < 0.05) but DOPAC was significantly lower at 8 am than at 8 pm in DRD mice (P < 0.01). (D) Similarly, for the DOPAC/dopamine ratio, there was a significant genotype × time interaction effect [F(1,23) = 12.6, P < 0.01] with significantly greater dopamine turnover at 8 pm than at 8 am in DRD mice (P < 0.001), but not normal mice. Statistical analyses were performed using a two-way ANOVA with Student’s t-test post hoc analyses for TH activity, dopamine and DOPAC concentrations, and Holm-Sidak post hoc analysis for turnover values. Values represent mean ± SEM; *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001.