Table 5.

Variables related to a high effectiveness of rehabilitation in three multivariate logistical regression models

Variable	OR (95 % CI)	p-value
Absolute functional gain ≥20
Charlson index ≤3	1.52 (1.08–2.12)	0.015
Lawton index
0	ref.
1–5	1.60 (1.07–2.38)	0.022
6–8	2.38 (1.42–4.02)	0.001
Functional capacity at admission
Barthel index ≤10	ref.
Barthel index 11–50	2.68 (1.75–4.11)	<0.001
Barthel index >50	0.96 (0.51–1.83)a	0.905
Dysphagia (absent)	1.79 (1,21–2.66)	0.004
Discrimination power of model: AUC (95 % CI): 0.713 (0.673–0.752)
Calibration of model: Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.636
Relative functional gain ≥35 %
Diagnosis of respiratory disease (absent)	1.89 (1.32–2.71)	0.001
Functional capacity at admission
Barthel index ≤10	ref.
Barthel index 11–25	2.63 (1.67–4.15)	<0.001
Barthel index >25	5.36 (3.48–8.23)	<0.001
Discrimination power of model: AUC (95 % CI): 0.705 (0.659–0.750)
Calibration of model: Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.978
Rehabilitation Efficiency index ≥0.50
Diagnosis of respiratory disease (absent)	1.72 (1.16–2.55)	0.007
Functional capacity at admission
Barthel index ≤10	ref.
Barthel index 11–25	1.79 (1.08–2.97)	0.025
Barthel index ≥26	2.60 (1.55–4.35)	<0.001
Dysphagia (absent)	1.92 (1.23–2.98)	0.004
Discrimination power of model: AUC (95 % CI): 0.689 (0.640–0.739)
Calibration of model: Hosmer-Lemeshow test: p = 0.891

OR (95 % CI): Odds Ratio, Confidence Interval 95 %

^aCeiling effect