Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Apr 22.
Published in final edited form as: J Am Stat Assoc. 2015 Apr 22;110(509):289–302. doi: 10.1080/01621459.2014.892008

Table 4.

Simulation 2: the estimates of rejection rates were reported at 6 different MAFs, 5 different qs, and 2 different σ2 values at significance level α = 5%. For each case, 100 simulated data sets were used.

Power Type I error
σ2 = 1
MAF\q 50 100 200 400 800 50 100 200 400 800
0.050 0.950 0.955 0.930 0.940 0.930 0.045 0.060 0.030 0.070 0.080
0.100 0.995 0.990 0.990 0.980 0.975 0.045 0.055 0.040 0.045 0.045
0.200 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.045 0.045 0.080 0.030 0.060
0.300 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.065 0.040 0.020 0.065 0.060
0.400 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.050 0.070 0.035 0.060 0.070
0.500 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.060 0.050 0.030 0.020 0.035
σ2 = 3
0.050 0.915 0.875 0.765 0.795 0.735 0.050 0.040 0.030 0.050 0.065
0.100 0.970 0.960 0.940 0.875 0.865 0.040 0.055 0.070 0.080 0.050
0.200 0.995 0.985 0.975 0.975 0.970 0.015 0.050 0.060 0.010 0.065
0.300 1.000 1.000 0.990 0.970 0.955 0.045 0.055 0.055 0.080 0.040
0.400 0.995 1.000 1.000 0.990 0.985 0.055 0.035 0.045 0.050 0.070
0.500 0.995 1.000 1.000 0.985 0.980 0.085 0.055 0.055 0.065 0.030