Table 2. Statistical analysis of and Δ values for overexpressed eGFP-ERK2, endogenous ERK1/2 and rERK2-LOC, 15 min after serum or FGF4 stimulation.
Treatments | n | S | p value | Fold-change | Δ | Ratio rERK2-LOC / IF:ERK1/2 | ||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
eGFP-rERK2 | Baseline | 0.586 ± 0.024 | 10 | |||||
Serum | 0.692 ± 0.083 | 5 | ns | 0.4658 | 1.18 | |||
FGF4 | 0.643 ± 0.050 | 6 | ns | 0.9065 | 1.10 | |||
U0126 | 0.659 ± 0.054 | 8 | ns | 0.6977 | 1.13 | |||
U0126 + serum | 0.767 ± 0.043 | 6 | * | 0.0355 | 1.31 | |||
U0126 + FGF4 | 0.598 ± 0.019 | 11 | ns | 0.9997 | 1.02 | |||
DMSO + serum | 0.759 ± 0.068 | 7 | * | 0.0353 | 1.30 | |||
DMSO + FGF4 | 0.701 ± 0.036 | 10 | ns | 0.1933 | 1.20 | |||
IF:ERK1/2 | Baseline | 0.200 ± 0.009 | 16 | |||||
Serum | 0.273 ± 0.007 | 9 | *** | 0.0003 | 1.37 | 0.073 ± 0.011 | ||
FGF4 | 0.291 ± 0.008 | 27 | **** | < 0.0001 | 1.46 | 0.091 ± 0.012 | ||
U0126 | 0.204 ± 0.011 | 13 | ns | 0.9996 | 1.02 | 0.004 ± 0.014 | ||
U0126 + serum | 0.230 ± 0.012 | 12 | ns | 0.2652 | 1.15 | 0.030 ± 0.016 | ||
U0126 + FGF4 | 0.214 ± 0.019 | 7 | ns | 0.957 | 1.07 | 0.014 ± 0.021 | ||
DMSO + serum | 0.271 ± 0.010 | 18 | **** | < 0.0001 | 1.36 | 0.071 ± 0.013 | ||
DMSO + FGF4 | 0.287 ± 0.025 | 6 | *** | 0.0002 | 1.44 | 0.087 ± 0.026 | ||
rERK2-LOC | Baseline | 0.064 ± 0.009 | 12 | |||||
serum | 0.480 ± 0.007 | 7 | **** | < 0.0001 | 7.50 | 0.416 ± 0.041 | 5.70 | |
FGF4 | 0.508 ± 0.008 | 16 | **** | < 0.0001 | 7.94 | 0.444 ± 0.040 | 4.88 | |
U0126 | 0.083 ± 0.011 | 15 | ns | 0.9952 | 1.30 | 0.019 ± 0.016 | 4.75 | |
U0126 + serum | 0.082 ± 0.012 | 6 | ns | 0.9994 | 1.28 | 0.018 ± 0.014 | 0.60 | |
U0126 + FGF4 | 0.112 ± 0.019 | 11 | ns | 0.7481 | 1.75 | 0.048 ± 0.013 | 3.43 | |
DMSO + serum | 0.353 ± 0.010 | 7 | **** | < 0.0001 | 5.52 | 0.289 ± 0.058 | 4.07 | |
DMSO + FGF4 | 0.358 ± 0.025 | 18 | **** | < 0.0001 | 5.60 | 0.294 ± 0.026 | 3.38 |
Statistical significance for differences among overexpressed eGFP-rERK2, endogenous ERK1/2 and rERK2-LOC was tested by one-way ANOVA and Dunnett’s test, accepting p ≤ 0.05 as significant. The ratio between Δ of endogenous ERK1/2 and rERK2-LOC shows the differences in magnitude order in function of the treatment. Symbols: , average of CI values ± SEM; Δ, difference between means compared to baseline value as reference; SEM, Standard Error of Mean; n, number of cells analyzed; S: statistically significant; ns, p > 0.05;
*, p ≤ 0.05;
**, p ≤ 0.01;
***, p ≤ 0.001;
****, p ≤ 0.0001.