Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: Water (Basel). 2015 Mar 18;7(3):1202–1216. doi: 10.3390/w7031202

Table A1.

Overall recovery efficiencies for microbes undergoing secondary concentration.

Site n Overall % Recovery Efficiency (SD)

ΦX174 MS2 Echovirus 1 C. parvum




Centricon PEG Centricon PEG Centricon PEG IMS
Chattahoochee river 6 41 (21) 49 (14) 69 (19) 66 (36) 17 (17) 34 (28) 82 (43)
Murphy Candler 5 50 (14) 46 (12) 56 (33) 44 (16) 15 (7) 32 (26) 60 (21)
Lawrenceville 4 * 80 (24) 83 (28) 77 (13) 80 (7) 60 (13) 100 (21) 117 (43)
Jefferson City 4 73 (20) 76 (21) 62 (8) 58 (9) 15 (7) 77 (21) 109 (12)
Lake Allatoona 3 53 (23) 61 (29) 27 (4) 42 (13) 15 (8) 30 (9) 47

Cross-site avg. 58 (24) 61 (23) 61 (24) 59 (24) 22 (19) 51 (35) 84 (38)

Notes:

*

n = 3 for C. parvum and Echovirus 1;

n = 1 for C. parvum;

n = 3 for C. parvum.