Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Oct 30.
Published in final edited form as: Water (Basel). 2015 Mar 18;7(3):1202–1216. doi: 10.3390/w7031202

Table 3.

Secondary concentration recovery efficiencies.

Site n Average % bRecovery Efficiency (SD)
ΦX174 MS2 Echovirus 1 C. parvum




Centricon PEG Centricon PEG Centricon PEG IMS
Chattahoochee river 6 70 (27) 88 (18) 81 (16) 69 (19) 26 (28) 52 (43) 109 (56)
Murphy Candler 5 67 (13) 63 (14) 81 (39) 73 (12) 30 (12) 60 (41) 87 (16)
Lawrenceville 4 * 80 (10) 81 (11) 93 (13) 99 (28) 56 (18) 89 (22) 85 (27)
Jefferson City 4 * 69 (6) 72 (5) 81 (8) 75 (11) 39 (19) 220 (100) 110 (47)
Lake Allatoona 3 64 (19) 73 (20) 55 (13) 81 (9) 31 (9) 64 (21) 48

Cross-site avg. 70 (17) 76 (16) 79 (23) 78 (19) 35 (21) 92 (80) 95 (40)

Notes:

*

n = 3 for C. parvum;

n = 1 for C. parvum.