Skip to main content
. 2015 Apr 29;52(6):1057–1062. doi: 10.1007/s00592-015-0757-5

Table 2.

Comparison of CGM glycemic variability parameters between the study groups

Parameter WFS group (Mean ± SD) T1D group (Mean ± SD) p level
Mean 150.28 ± 14.41 138.21 ± 29.38 0.166
Standard deviation 41.89 ± 10.34 52.40 ± 21.54 0.099
%CV 28.08 ± 7.37 37.87 ± 14.24 0.029
M100 index 12.18 ± 4.88 15.58 ± 12.22 0.305
J index 37.20 ± 6.81 38.16 ± 17.34 0.837
CONGA1h 34.29 ± 7.72 39.10 ± 14.26 0.273
CONGA2h 47.04 ± 9.52 58.06 ± 22.03 0.079
CONGA4h 54.96 ± 11.92 74.12 ± 28.74 0.020
CONGA6h 55.99 ± 10.58 80.26 ± 35.05 0.009

p values below 0.05 are marked in bold

%CV percentage coefficient of variation, CONGA continuous net glycemic action, T1D type 1 diabetes, WFS Wolfram syndrome