Skip to main content
. 2015 May 18;88(1051):20150147. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150147

Table 2.

Descriptive statistics comparing lesion size and uptake factor (X) according to breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS)® categories, rating of the lesions as malignant or benign and grading

Number of lesions n (%) Lesion sizea
Uptake factor
Mean ± CI Mean ± CI
Total 92 18.27 ± 2.23 3.98 ± 0.52
Malignant 67 (72.8) 18.42 ± 2.30 4.27b ± 0.64
Benign 25 (27.2) 17.88 ± 5.51 2.37b ± 0.18
BI-RADS IV 35 (38.0) 16.49 ± 4.04 2.43c ± 0.15
BI-RADS V 57 (62.0) 19.39 ± 2.60 4.50c ± 0.72
G1 level 8 (12.3) 18.00 ± 6.20 3.96 ± 1.25
G2 level 45 (69.2) 17.73 ± 3.04 3.98 ± 0.69
G3 level 12 (18.5) 20.36 ± 3.80 5.63 ± 2.14

CI, confidence interval; levels: G1, well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, undifferentiated.

a

Based on 91 cases, as 1 outlier with a lesion size of 120 mm has been excluded.

b

Significant mean difference between benign and malignant (Welch two-sample t-test, t = −5.094, degrees of freedom (df) = 68.956, p = 0.000; CI, −2.87 to −1.29).

c

Significant mean difference between BI-RADS IV and BI-RADS V cases (Welch two-sample t-test, t = −5.254, df = 59.545, p = 0.000; CI, −2.64 to −1.15).