Table 1.
1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Experienced coworker incivility (1) | |||||||||
Experienced supervisor incivility (2) | .50 | ||||||||
Witnessed coworker incivility (3) | .60 | .40 | |||||||
Witnessed supervisor incivility (4) | .41 | .77 | .50 | ||||||
Control (5) | −.21 | −.32 | −.14 | −.26 | |||||
Job demands (6) | .24 | .33 | .22 | .31 | −.17 | ||||
Support coworker (7) | −.41 | −.26 | −.29 | −.20 | .26 | −.20 | |||
Support supervisor (8) | −.33 | −.61 | −.28 | −.54 | .43 | −.31 | .43 | ||
Negative outcomes (9) | −.40 | −.55 | −.35 | −.51 | .41 | −.38 | .33 | .56 | |
Instigated incivility (10) | .39 | .34 | .44 | .37 | −.04 | −.17 | −.18 | −.18 | −.23 |
M (of scales) | 6.87 | 7.71 | 8.44 | 8.40 | 12.72 | 3.02 | 6.02 | 6.33 | 6.80 |
SD (of scales) | 6.18 | 7.25 | 6.69 | 7.40 | 5.73 | 3.27 | 3.87 | 3.68 | 2.83 |
Note. All correlations except the relationship between control and instigated incivility (−.04) were significant at p < .001.