Table 4.
Logistic regression analyses of prognostic variables for RTW after one year.
| Prognostic variables | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | Model 4 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95% CI) | OR (95%) | |
| Low decision authority | 0.982 (0.970–0.999) | 0.987 (0.971–1.004) | 0.986 (0.971–1.002) | 0.990 (0.975–1.007) |
| Bullying | 0.715 (0.513–0.994) | 0.677 (0.474–0.966) | 0.634 (0.426–0.926) | 0.731 (0.513–1.040) |
| Work ability index | 1.220 (1.038–1.434) | 1.285 (1.074–1.537) | 1.356 (1.113–1.612) | 1.235 (1.029–1.401) |
| Full-time sick leave at baseline | 0.431 (0.222–0.830) | 0.430 (0.223–0.830) | 0.454 (0.234–0.880) | 0.511 (0.251–1.010) |
In models 1–3, the prognostic variable was analyzed separately with adjustment for the following.
Model 1: age, gender, marital status, and occupational position.
Model 2: model 1 and global symptom index.
Model 3: model 2 and life events.
Model 4: all four prognostic variables forced into the model adjusted for age, gender, occupational position, global symptom index, marital status, and life event last year.