Table 2.
Previously published clinical studies reporting the accordion technique during delayed or absent callus formation of distraction osteogenesis (DO).
Authors | Number of patients | Indication | Successful outcome | Technique for accordion maneuver |
---|---|---|---|---|
Iacobellis et al. 2010 [26] | 3 | Poor regenerate during bone transport | 100% (3/3) |
Compression followed by distraction of the transport segment (no details) |
| ||||
Hatzokos et al. 2011 [24] | 8 | Delayed consolidation | 75% (6/8) |
Accordion technique (no details). |
| ||||
Kawoosa et al. 2003 [25] | 1 | Delayed consolidation | 100% (1/1) |
Alternate compression and distraction of the regenerate (no details) |
| ||||
El-Mowafi et al. 2005 [27] | N = ? | Delayed consolidation | ? | Compression and distraction of a moving segment (no details) |
| ||||
El-Sayed et al. 2010 [17] | 25 | Absence of callus formation | 76% (19/25) |
Distraction-compression technique (no details) |
| ||||
Tsuchiya et al. 1997 [28] | N = ? | Poor regenerate during bone transport | ? | Compression and distraction of a moving segment (no details) |
| ||||
Vidyadhara and Rao 2007 [15] | N = ? | Poor regenerate callus during bone transport | ? | Compression and distraction of a moving segment (no details). |
| ||||
Simpson and Kenwright 2000 [16] | 2 | Poor callus formation | 0% (0/2) |
Changes in the dynamics of distraction (no details) |
| ||||
Krishnan et al. 2006 [19] | 2 | Poor regenerate during bone transport | 100% (2/2) | Reported as distraction, discontinued, reversed, and restarted at a reduced rate (0.25 mm/12 h, instead of 0.25 mm/6 h) |