Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 2;15:831. doi: 10.1186/s12885-015-1870-0

Table 1.

Subgroup analysis according to region, study design and NOS score

Heterogeneity
Confounding factors NO. studies Odds ratio (95 % CI) I 2 p
Region
 Eastern
  BDST 4 12.34 (4.54–33.57) 59.1 % 0.062
  GBST 4 1.77 (0.88–3.58) 85.7 % 0.000
 Western
  BDST 2 23.35 (17.63–30.92) 0.0 % 0.974
  GBST 2 2.81 (1.03–7.72) 36.3 % 0.210
Study design
 Nationwide
  BDST 3 21.07 (16.85–26.36) 0.0 % 0.494
  GBST 2 2.78 (2.37–3.26) 0.0 % 0.328
 Hospital-based
  BDST 3 9.75 (1.73–54.84) 62.5 % 0.056
  GBST 4 1.42 (0.63–3.19) 70 % 0.019
NOS score
 High
  BDST 3 18.49 (12.90–26.50) 0.0 % 0.463
  GBST 3 2.58 (1.59–4.21) 53.2 % 0.118
 Moderate
  BDST 3 9.53 (2.55–35.59) 75.2 % 0.018
  GBST 3 1.57 (0.54–4.61) 79.4 % 0.008

CI confidence interval, EHST extrahepatic bile duct stone or choledocholithiasis, GBST gallbladder stone or cholecystolithiasis