Table 3.
citHSP90αa | citHSP90βa | PP 1C-5Cb | PP 1-5b | PP 6C-10Cb | PP 6-10b | Peptides | Tet Toxoidc | |||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BAL | S | BAL | S | BAL | S | BAL | S | BAL | S | BAL | S | BAL | S | BAL | S | |
RA-ILD | ||||||||||||||||
− | − | 1+ | +/− | 2+ | − | 2+ | − | 1+ | − | 1+ | 1+ | 5,5C 6, 6C 7, 7C 10,10C |
5,5C 6 10Cd |
4+ | 4+ | |
− | − | − | − | 3+ | − | 1+ | − | − | 1+ | − | 1+ | 4C | − | +/− | 3+ | |
− | − | − | − | 1–2+ | 1 + | 2+ | 2+ | − | − | − | − | 5,5C | 5,5C | 1+ | 3+ | |
RA-subILD | ||||||||||||||||
113e | 1+ | NA | − | NA | − | NA | − | NA | − | NA | − | NA | NA | NA | NA | NA |
1+ | 2+ | − | 1+ | 1+ | 1+ | − | − | − | − | − | − | 5C | 5C | − | 3+ | |
RA-no ILD | ||||||||||||||||
− | − | − | − | 1+ | − | +/− | − | − | − | − | − | 5d,5Cd | − | 2+ | 4+ | |
− | − | − | − | − | − | − | − | 3+ | 3+ | − | − | 6C,7C | 6C,7C | − | +/− |
Responses scored based on relative ratio of OD450 reading compared to that of standard reference serum (with gradations corresponding to thresholds depicted in Fig. 1A (+/− = relative OD450 0.75–1.0, 1 + =relative OD450 1.0–2.0, 2+ = relative OD450 > 2.0)), using recombinant citrullinated HSP90α or citrullinated HSP90β as substrate antigen (1 µg/ml).
Responses based on relative ratio of OD450 reading compared to that of standard reference serum, using peptide pools (PP) consisting of 1C–5C, 1–5, 6C–10C, or 6–10 (5 peptides/pool, each at 0.2 µg/ml) as substrate antigens; gradations again correspond to thresholds shown in Fig. 1B (+/− = relative OD450 0.75–1.0, 1 + = relative OD450 1.0–2.0, 2+ = relative OD450 2.0–3.0, 3+ = relative OD450 > 3.0).
Relative IgG anti-tetanus toxoid antibody titer (0 = OD450 < 0.25, +/− = OD450 0.25–0.5, 1 + = OD450 0.5–1.0, 2+ = OD450 1.0–1.5, 3+ = OD450 1.5–2.0, 4+ = OD450 > 2.0).
Low positive recognition.
Serum not available; NA = not assessed.
= +BALF, −serum; = +BALF, inverted serum peptide profile; = +BALF, +serum, TTS > TTBAL; = +BALF, +serum, TTS = TTBAL.