Table 1. Characteristics of Selected Papers .
Paper | Type of Paper | Country | Setting | Priority Setting Activity | Study Objective a |
Baerøe17 2009 | Conceptual | - | - | Resource allocation among patient groups | To develop a clinical decision-making framework |
Bell et al18 2004 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian tertiary hospital | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process in a Canadian hospital in response to the SARS outbreak |
Bruni et al19 2007 | Empirical | Canada | The Wait Times Strategy of Ontario, Canada | Resource allocation among patient groups | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process in a Canadian hospital |
Danjoux et al20 2007 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian urban university academic health sciences centre | Adoption of new technology (endovascular aneurysm repair) | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process for the adoption of a new technology for repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms in a Canadian academic health sciences center |
Dolan et al21 2007 | Conceptual | - | - | Resource allocation at all levels of the healthcare system | To explore the relevance of procedural characteristics that are important in legal studies and social psychology to social choice contexts and provide evidence on their relative importance. To explore why certain procedural conditions are considered important |
Friedman22 2008 | Conceptual | - | - | No specific priority setting activity | To critically examine the accountability for reasonableness framework |
Gallego23 2007 | Empirical | Australia | An Australian teaching and tertiary care hospital | Medicine selection | To describe and evaluate the medicine selection process for high cost drugs in an Australian hospital |
Gibson et al24 2004 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian academic health science center | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To assist decision-makers in a Canadian academic health center to develop fair priority setting processes |
Gibson et al25 2005 | Empirical | Canada | An Canadian urban academic health center | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To examine the influence of power dynamics among actors to the priority setting processes in a Canadian hospital |
Gibson et al26 2006 | Empirical | Canada | A health region in Canada | Allocation of healthcare resources within the district/region | To evaluate the use of PBMA at a health region in Canada |
Gordon et al27 2009 | Empirical | Argentina | An Argentinean acute care tertiary hospital | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process in an Argentinean hospital with particular attention to the appeal process |
Greenberg et al28 2005 | Empirical | Israel | The National health insurer in Israel | Medicine selection | To evaluate the adoption of new technologies at the hospital level in Israel |
Kapiriri and Martin29 2006 | Empirical | Uganda | A 1500 bed tertiary hospital in Uganda | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe the priority setting practice in a tertiary care hospital in Uganda and evaluate the process |
Kapiriri and Martin30 2007 | Empirical | Uganda | Three hospitals, one in Norway, one Uganda, and one in Canada | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe and evaluate priority setting practices at the macro, meso and micro levels of the health systems in Uganda, Norway, and Canada |
Kapiriri and Martin6 2010 | Empirical | LMICs | LMICs | Resource allocation at all levels of the healthcare system | To develop a framework for successful priority setting in LMICs |
Madden et al31 2005 | Empirical | Canada | Three Canadian teaching hospitals | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process in a Canadian hospital with particular attention to the appeal process |
Maluka et al32 2011 | Empirical | Tanzania | A district in Tanzania | Allocation of healthcare resources within the district/region | To evaluate healthcare resource allocation at the district level in Tanzania |
Martin et al33 2002 | Empirical | Canada | The advisory committee for the Ontario drug funding program of cancer care and the expert panel on Intracoronary Stents and Abciximab of the Ontario Cardiac Care Network | Assessment of health technology adoption in cardiac and cancer care | To evaluate the priority setting processes in a cardiac and cancer care center in Canada |
Martin et al34 2003 | Empirical | Canada | Three Canadian teaching hospitals | Medicines selection | To describe and evaluate priority setting for medicine selection in a Canadian hospital |
Martin et al35 2003 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian tertiary-care teaching hospital | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe and evaluate the strategic planning process in a Canadian hospital |
Mitton and Donaldson36 2003 | Empirical | Canada | Three Canadian health regions | Resource allocation within the district/region | To examine lessons learned from the evaluation of the implementation of PBMA in a Canadian health region |
Mitton et al37 2003 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian hospitals’ surgical department | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To evaluate the priority setting process in a surgical programme in a Canadian hospital |
Mori et al38 2012 | Empirical | Tanzania | Respondents from the Tanzanian health sector | Medicine selection | To evaluate the policy change to artemisinin combination therapy for the management of uncomplicated malaria |
Peacock et al39 2006 | Conceptual | - | - | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | We describe checklists that can be used by decision-makers and clinicians for priority setting |
Reeleder et al40 2005 | Empirical | Canada | Forty-six Canadian hospitals | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To evaluate hospital managers assessment on the fairness of priority setting process in their hospitals |
Sharma et al41 2006 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian community hospital | Adoption health technology (advanced laparoscopic surgery) | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process for the adoption of advanced laparoscopic surgery at a Canadian hospital |
Shayo et al42 2012 | Empirical | Tanzania | District health system | Resource allocation within the district/region | To examine challenges to fair priority setting in healthcare with a special focus on the role of ethnicity, gender, education, and wealth in Tanzania |
Sibbald et al7 2009 | Empirical | Canada | International, national, and local respondents in the Canadian health system | Resource allocation at all levels of the healthcare system | To develop a framework for successful priority setting in healthcare |
Sibbald et al8 2010 | Empirical | Canada | A Canadian urban community hospital | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To pilot a framework for successful priority setting in healthcare |
Valdebenito43 et al 2009 | Empirical | Chile | A referral and teaching hospital in Chile | Resource allocation across hospital service areas and departments | To describe and evaluate the priority setting process in a Chilean hospital |
Wailoo and Anand44 2005 | Empirical | United Kingdom | The public in a district in the United Kingdom | Resource allocation at all levels of the healthcare system | To explore the application of procedural preferences in healthcare priority setting processes |
Abbreviations: SARS, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome; PBMA, programme budgeting and marginal analysis; LMICs, low and middle income countries.
a The study objective column of the table are based on quotes from the respective papers