Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep 16;4(11):719–732. doi: 10.15171/ijhpm.2015.167

Table 3. Frequency of Use/Proposal of Procedural and Outcome Measures in Selected Papers .

Process Measures of Priority Setting (No. of Use) Outcome Measures of Priority Setting (No. of Use)
Stakeholder engagement (27)
Transparency (25)
Provision for revision (25)
Use of evidence/information (26)
Enforcement (22)
Empowerment (3)
Consistency (2)
Accuracy (1)
Neutrality (1)
Increase in the ease of resource allocation (1)
Optimized return on time invested (1)
One on one meetings (1)
Data should not be mechanically used (1)
Values and context are considered (2)
Increased stakeholder understanding (3)
Shifted or reallocated resources (6)
Increased stakeholder satisfaction (4)
Implementation of decisions (3)
Improved patient outcomes (2)
Efficiency (2)
Improved quality of decision-making (1)
Promotion of organizational objectives (1)
Increased stakeholder acceptance (1)
Increased stakeholder agreements (1)
Reduction in resource wastage (1)
Increased internal accountability (1)
Increased priority setting capacity (1)
Increased healthcare investment (1)
Emulation by other organizations (1)
Balanced budget (1)