Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2015 Nov 2.
Published in final edited form as: Stat Med. 2014 Nov 10;34(4):595–612. doi: 10.1002/sim.6357

Table V.

Proportional odds logistic regression analysis of disparity in overweight/obesity among non-pregnant women (< 20 years) by race groups.

Group Outcome Sample size Observed prevalence (%) or expectation of outcome Predicted prevalence (%) or expectation1 of outcome Unexplained disparity (SE)2 Percent of disparity explained3 F value P value
White Overweight 761 27.67% 27.73% 0
Obesity 819 30.78% 30.85% 0
Black Overweight 289 27.55% 27.96% 0.41% (0.019) –222% 0.065 0.80
Obesity 529 52.08% 34.55% –17.53% (0.020) 18% 105.34 <.0001
Overall 50.23 <.0001
Score of (normal, overweight, obesity) = (1, 0.93, 1.3)
White 2647 1.07 1.07 0
Black 1013 1.14 1.08 –0.053 (0.0067) 17% 63.25 <.0001
Score of (normal, overweight, obesity) = (21.87, 26.79, 33.27)
White 2647 26.74 26.75 0
Black 1013 29.16 27.18 –1.98 (0.20) 18% 102.09 <.0001
1

Expectation of the outcome using the predicted prevalence.

2

Unexplained disparity is (observed prevalence or expectation of outcome (White) –predicted prevalence or expectation of outcome using predicted prevalence (Black)).

3

Percent disparity explained is (1– unexplained disparity) /(observed prevalence or expectation of outcome(White) – predicted prevalence or expectation of outcome using predicted prevalence (Black))*100.