Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Soc Sci Med. 2015 Sep 25;145:26–34. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2015.09.026

Table 1.

Study Characteristics for included studies (n=27)

Author and year Country Participants Type of study Design
Allan et al., 2012 Scotland Smokers who dropped out of a smoking cessation program that had a final incentive (n=14) Qualitative Unstructured interviews
Baer et al., 1989 USA Smokers who had not resumed regular smoking 4 weeks post-treatment (n=102) Quantitative Prospective, in context cessation intervention, followed up to 1 year post-treatment.
Bell et al., 2010 Canada Smokers and ex-smokers recruited from newspaper advertisements (n=25) Qualitative Open-ended interviews
Bennasar Veny et al., 2011 Spain Female nurses who had been habitual smokers for at least two years prior to the study (n=15) Qualitative Semi-structured interviews
Berlin & Covey, 2006 USA Smokers recruited for a smoking cessation trial (n=600) Quantitative Prospective, in context of cessation intervention, followed through 3 months of treatment and 6 months post-treatment.
Betzner et al., 2012 USA Smokers and recent quitters who responded to a tobacco cessation program (n=166) Qualitative Focus groups and in-depth interviews
Bottorff et al., 2013 Canada Mother and father dyads who were current and former smokers with a 1 year old child at baseline (n=28) Qualitative In-depth interviews when child was 1 year, 20–35 months, and 36–48 months
Bush et al., 2003 England Purposive sample of Bangladeshi and Pakistani smokers and nonsmokers in Newcastle (n=141) Qualitative Semi-structured, in-depth interviews and focus groups
Copeland, 2003 Scotland Female smokers, General Practitioners, and nursing staff recruited from a general practice (n=41) Qualitative/Quantitative Observational cross-sectional quantitative survey and open-ended qualitative questionnaire
Farrimond & Joffe, 2006 UK Smokers and non-smokers with diverse socioeconomic statuses (n=40) Qualitative Conceptual mapping, ‘episodic’ interviews, semi-structured interview
Fong et al., 2004 Australia, Canada, USA and UK Participants from the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation Survey (Canada n=2,193; United States n=2,115; United Kingdom n=2,344; Australia n=2,271) Quantitative Observational cross-sectional survey
Frohlich et al., 2010 Canada Current adult smokers recruited with purposive sampling (n=17) Qualitative Semi-structured interviews
Gibbons et al., 1991 USA Adult smokers responding to a smoking cessation program advertisement (n=120) Quantitative Prospective, 16 weekly surveys in context of intervention and 6 month post-quit date follow up survey
Goldstein, 1991 Canada Adult smokers and nonsmokers household level 1989 Winnipeg Area Study (n=521) Quantitative Observational cross-sectional survey
Greaves et al., 2010 Canada New fathers who continued to smoke during partner’s pregnancy and/or post-partum (n=29) Qualitative In-depth, semi-structured interviews
Grove, 1993 Australia Smokers who had ever made a quit attempt (n=155) Quantitative Observational cross-sectional survey
Holdsworth & Robinson, 2008 UK Mothers with at least one smoking parent and a child under 5 (n=17) Qualitative Interviews using the Bibliographic Narrative Interpretative Method
Kirchner et al., 2012 USA Smokers enrolled in a research smoking cessation clinic who had experienced a lapse (n=203) Quantitative Prospective, in the context of a cessation intervention, ecological momentary assessments collected during the first 6 weeks of a quit attempt
Lee & Paek, 2012 Korea Male smokers (n=255) Quantitative Quasi-experimental, survey pre and post one of 3 types of anti-smoking message conditions
Lee & Paek, 2013 Korea and USA University student smokers (n=310) Quantitative Quasi-experimental survey pre and post one of 3 types of anti-smoking message conditions
Louka et al., 2006 UK and Greece Adult smokers (n=21) Qualitative Semi-structured interviews and focus groups
McCarthy et al., 2010 USA Adult daily smokers (n=463) Quantitative Prospective, in the context of a cessation intervention, ecological momentary assessments pre- and post-quitting smoking
Oliffe et al., 2012 Canada New fathers who smoked (n=24) Qualitative Four audio-recorded group sessions
Ritchie et al., 2010 Scotland Adult current smokers and recent ex-smokers (n=40) Qualitative Three-wave longitudinal in-depth interviews
Scheffels, 2009 Norway Established daily smokers sampled for diversity on gender and social class (n=21) Qualitative Semi-structured interviews
Stuber et al., 2008 USA Current and former smokers in New York City (n=816) Quantitative Observational cross-sectional survey
Stuber & Galea, 2009 USA Current New York City smokers (n=835) Quantitative Observational cross-sectional survey
Supnick & Colletti, 1984 USA Individuals who completed a smoking cessation program (n=33) Quantitative Prospective, followed up after a cessation intervention monthly through 6 months post-treatment
Thompson, et al., 2007 New Zealand Smokers (n=17) and ex-smokers (n=9) living in a diverse, socioeconomically disadvantaged neighborhood Qualitative Semi-structured interviews
Van der Heiden et al., 2013 Netherlands Lower-educated daily smokers (n=18) Qualitative Structured in-depth interviews