Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Neuropsychologia. 2015 Oct 14;78:221–230. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.10.014

Table 2.

Regions that showed spatial overlap of successful memory activity during encoding and retrieval of negative photos.

Lobe Region Hem Approximate Brodmann’s area MNI Coordinates (x,y,z) TAL Coordinates (x,y,z) Cluster remains when individual maps thresholded at p < 0.005?
Temporal Inferior temporal gyrus, Middle temporal gyrus L 20/21/37 −60,−46,−11 −57,−43,−11 Y
L 20/21 −48,−7,−26a −45,−6,−20 Y
Inferior temporal gyrus R 20 45,−13,−29a 41,−12,−22 N
Middle temporal gyrus R 21 57,−34,−11 52,−33,−8 N
Frontal Inferior frontal gyrus L 45 −48,32,4 −45,28,10 Y
Superior frontal gyrus L 8 −12,38,55 −13,29,56 Y
Parietal Inferior parietal lobule L 40 −48,−55,49 −46,−57,42 Y
R 39 54,−61,43 48,−63,38 Y
Other Anterior cingulate L 32 −21,17,−29 −20,17,−21 N

Note:

a

Denotes a VOTC cluster that also shows a significant interaction with positive items, whereby memory the relationship for Negative Hits vs Negative Misses is stronger than Positive Hits vs. Positive Misses.