Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2015 Aug 11;104(5):1227–1235. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.07.1150

Table 4.

ANCOVA models comparing phthalate metabolite concentrations in infertile women who did (n=41) and did not use ART (n=25) to conceive.

Model 1: Phthalate metabolite concentrations adjusted based on SG using formula2 Model 2: SG included as covariate
Geometric Mean Ratio 95% Confidence Limits p-value Geometric Mean Ratio 95% Confidence Limits p-value
ΣDEHP 0.83 0.71 0.98 0.02 0.84 0.71 1.01 0.06
MEOHP 0.84 0.71 0.98 0.03 0.84 0.71 0.98 0.03
MEHHP 0.82 0.68 0.98 0.03 0.81 0.68 0.98 0.03
MEHP 0.83 0.69 1.00 0.05 0.83 0.69 1.00 0.05
MECCP 0.84 0.71 0.98 0.03 0.85 0.71 1.01 0.06
MBZP 0.87 0.53 1.43 0.58 0.90 0.52 1.54 0.69
MEP 1.00 0.44 2.27 1.00 1.04 0.45 2.42 0.92
MIBP 0.94 0.77 1.16 0.58 0.96 0.74 1.24 0.72
MCPP 0.96 0.50 1.83 0.91 1.00 0.52 1.93 1.00
MBP 0.90 0.73 1.10 0.30 0.91 0.72 1.16 0.44

1 Adjusted for BMI, age, center, lab and household income.

2

Pc = P [(1.014-1)/SpG-1)]