Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Fertil Steril. 2015 Sep 3;104(5):1302–1309.e4. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.08.002

TABLE 1.

Comparison of Ovarian Morphology Measured by MRI in Adolescent Subjects with PCOS vs. Controls using Rotterdam, Lujan et al, and Current Study Criteria

PCOS (N=39) Controls (N=22) p -value
Number ovaries 78 44
Median (IQR) OV(cm3) 11.8 (6.9) 7.0 (4.4) <0.001
Mean ± SD OV (cm3) 13.6 ± 8.5 7.4 ± 3.4 <0.001
% (number) of ovaries with OV >10 cm3 (Rotterdam) 65% (51) 23% (10) <0.001
% (number) of ovaries with OV >14 cm3 (Kenigsberg et al) 33% (26) 5% (2) <0.001
Median (IQR) FNPS (2–9mm) 12.0 (5.0) 7.5 (5.0) <0.001
Mean±SD FNPS (2–9mm) 12.7 ± 4.0 7.7 ± 4.4 <0.001
% (number) of ovaries with FNPS ≥12 (Rotterdam)a 64% (50) 18% (8) <0.001
% (number) of ovaries with FNPS ≥9 (Lujan et al) 85% (66) 41% (18) <0.01
% (number) of ovaries with FNPS ≥17 (Kenigsberg et al) 17% (13) 2% (1) 0.01
% (number) of ovaries with peripheral distribution of follicles 62% (48) 37% (15)b 0.01
% stromal area (stromal area/total area) 51 ± 11.2 49 ± 14.3 NS

Data presented as median with interquartile range (IQR) or mean ± SD

a

Based on follicle count from Rotterdam criteria

b

Unable to evaluate on 3 ovaries thus denominator is 41 not 44

OV = Ovarian Volume; FNPS = Follicle Number Per Section