Abstract
The incidence of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder, continues to soar with the rapid growth of the elderly population, thus creating an enormous social and economic burden. Although disease-modifying drugs to treat AD are not yet available, several candidate drugs are in clinical trials. Most of these drugs are expected to be effective at the early stages of the disease, and therefore the early and accurate diagnosis of AD will be a critical factor in efforts to improve the prognosis of patients with AD. This review focuses on lead radioligands developed to date and their preclinical data in order to facilitate the development of tau-specific positron emission tomography radioligands that are of great interest to the scientific community.
Keywords: Alzheimer’s disease, Tau, β-amyloid, Acetylcholinesterase, Radioligands, PET
Introduction
Our society is aging rapidly. This is leading to a substantial increase in the number of patients with dementia, a progressive cognitive decline with gradual restriction of daily activities, resulting in serious personal as well as social and economic burden. Data released by the Ministry of Health and Welfare show that in 2012, approximately 9.2 % of the Korean population 65 years and older suffered from dementia [http://www.mw.go.kr]. The World Health Organization predicts that the number of people with dementia will almost double over the next 20 years, with an estimated 7.7 million new cases each year [http://www.who.int]. There is a real need, therefore, to find solutions to critical issues in dementia, including the establishment of better diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Alzheimer’s disease (AD), a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by gradual deterioration of cognition and behavior, is estimated to account for about 71.3 % of all cases of dementia [http://www.mw.go.kr]. Today, approximately 40 million people worldwide are affected by AD. Moreover, the incidence of AD is surging as the aging population continues to increase.
Many global pharmaceutical companies are developing disease-modifying drugs to treat AD, and several candidate drugs are in clinical trials. Because most of these drugs are expected to be effective at the early stages of the disease, the early and accurate diagnosis of AD will be critical to provide a more favorable prognosis for AD patients. Currently, efforts to develop new positron emission tomography (PET) radioligands for diagnosis of AD are ongoing worldwide.
Imaging targets are based on a few hypotheses for AD pathogenesis, among which the cholinergic hypothesis is the oldest [1]. Here, AD is characterized by a deficiency of cholinergic activity in the brain. Histochemical studies of postmortem brain tissues showed that activity of choline acetyltransferase and acetylcholinesterase (AChE) is significantly reduced in AD [2–5]. To increase brain acetylcholine (ACh) concentration, AChE inhibitors that inhibit ACh hydrolysis can be used. For this reason, AChE inhibitors are currently used to improve symptoms of AD patients, although they failed to show efficacy in clinical trials [6, 7]. Recent studies suggested that the ACh depletion alone may not be the cause of AD. McDonald et al. posited that cholinergic depletion may decrease the brain's ability to balance up for the accumulation of risk factors which develop AD with aging [8]. Numerous studies using radiolabeled AChE substrates or inhibitors were carried out to measure AChE activity or density for diagnosis of AD [9–15].
In the amyloid cascade hypothesis [16], the accumulation of the β-amyloid (Aβ) peptides in the brain is an important characteristic of AD pathology. Aβ peptide is produced from amyloid precursor protein, and these fragments accumulate to form plaques in brains of patients with AD. This hypothesis has taken the major position in AD research and has been the basis of development of many AD-modifying drugs. Accordingly, in vivo monitoring of Aβ plaques may be beneficial for the diagnosis of AD. Many specific imaging radioligands have been developed for imaging Aβ plaques. Among these, the most well-characterized radioligand is 11C-Pittsburgh compound B (11C-PIB) (Fig. 1) [17]. However, routine clinical use of 11C-PIB is limited due to its short half-life (20 min), despite its lower subcortical white matter uptake compared to 18F-labeled radioligands [18]. Recently, three PET radiopharmaceuticals have been approved by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for diagnosis of AD, including florbetapir (Amyvid™, Eli Lilly), florbetaben (Neuraceq™, Piramal Imaging), and flutemetamol (18F) (Vizamyl™, GE Healthcare) [19–26].
Fig. 1.

Chemical structures of 11C-PIB and 18F-DDNP
In the past few years, tau and its role in AD have been the focus of immense interest. In the tau hypothesis, AD is caused by highly phosphorylated tau proteins that form neurofibrillary tangles (NFTs), one of the pathological hallmarks of the disease (Fig. 2). This hypothesis was based on neurobiological and clinical studies that revealed a high correlation between disease severity and increasing NFT accumulation in the brain [27]. Although the functions of tau are not fully established, it is widely accepted that tau binds to and stabilizes microtubules, which then regulates intracellular transport of organelles and substances [28, 29]. Upon hyperphosphorylation, tau is dissociated from microtubules and forms filaments [28]. More recently, the tau axis hypothesis has been proposed, in which tau mediates Aβ toxicity in the dendrites of neurons [30]. There are six tau isoforms in the human brain, and they are hyperphosphorylated and aggregated as paired helical filaments (PHFs) in the brains of individuals with AD [31, 32]. Different sets of the isoforms lead to different tau pathology, including AD, frontal temporal lobar degeneration, corticobasal degeneration, progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP), and Pick’s disease [31–35]. In addition, both tau and Aβ fibrils share the same β sheet structure [36–40]. Tau exists in much lower concentrations compared to Aβ plaques in brains with AD, and depending on brain region, tau concentrations are 5 to 20 times lower [41, 42]. However, tau imaging may still be beneficial because the severity of tau deposits correlates well with cognitive impairment in AD patients. Furthermore, tau imaging may be useful for detecting tauopathies other than AD [43].
Fig. 2.
Illustration of Aβ plaques and neurofibrillary tangles in brain tissue with AD
Tau Imaging Radioligands
Given the potential advantages of clinical tau imaging in AD, the development of radioligands for tau targeting is currently the focus of huge interest. In order to design ideal tau imaging radioligands, several criteria need to be met. This includes good penetration through neuronal cell membranes as well as the blood–brain barrier (BBB), not serving as a permeable glycoprotein 1 (Pgp) substrate, high binding affinity and selectivity for tau over Aβ plaques, desirable pharmacokinetics in the brain, little or no lipophilic radioactive metabolite formation, and favorable dosimetry [43]. The first radioligand that labeled NFTs and Aβ plaques in the brains of AD patients was 2-(1-{6-[(2-[18F]fluoroethyl)(methyl)amino]-2-naphthyl}ethylidene)malononitrile (18F-DDNP) (Fig. 1). Barrio et al. modified a neutral and lipophilic fluorescent dye, DDNP, for 18F-labeling [44, 45]. FDDNP exhibited Kd values of 36.7 ± 11.6 nM for K18ΔK280-tau fibrils and 5.52 ± 1.97 nM for Aβ42 fibrils [46] and was found to easily penetrate the BBB due to its high lipophilicity (log P = 3.71) [40].
The most successful strategy for developing tau-specific radioligands to date is based on the screening of compounds from chemical libraries and further structure optimization to increase binding affinity and selectivity for tau over Aβ fibrils. A research team from Tohoku University screened over 2000 compounds and found that quinoline and benzimidazole derivatives have selective binding for NFTs over Aβ plaques and show good penetration through the BBB [40, 47]. Based on the pharmacophore of the lead compounds, many tau-specific radioligands have been developed. 2-[(4-Methylamino)phenyl]quinoline (BF-158), one of the initially developed quinoline derivatives, exhibited relatively higher binding affinity for tau fibrils than for Aβ fibrils. Its 11C-labeled form, 11C-BF-158 displayed desirable pharmacokinetics in normal mouse brains, and autoradiography using the radioligand showed correlation of radioactivity uptake with tau immunostaining in AD brain sections. However, the radioligand was not entirely specific to tau pathology in AD brain tissues [47].
Maccioni et al. found that astemizole and lansoprazole bind to aggregated tau variants [48]. These benzimidazole derivatives are FDA-approved as antihistamine and gastrointestinal disorder drugs, respectively. Thereafter, a couple of research groups synthesized 11C- and 18F-labeled derivatives of astemizole and lansoprazole (Fig. 3) and reported that the ligands exhibited higher binding affinity for tau than Aβ fibrils (Table 1). They also found that the radioligands served as substrates for the rodent Pgp. Pre-treatment with cyclosporine A, a Pgp inhibitor, increased penetration of the radioligands through the BBB, possibly by inhibiting radioligand efflux. However, 18F-labeled astemizole derivatives had poor brain uptake both in untreated rats and in cyclosporine A-pretreated rats, despite its high binding affinity for tau fibrils and high lipophilicity of astemizole (log P = 5.57) [48, 49]. While 11C-N-methyl lansoprazole and 18F-N-methyl lansoprazole are not substrates for non-human primate Pgp, 18F-lansoprazole did not show uptake even in non-human primate brains [50, 51]. 18F-N-methyl lansoprazole is found to be favorable in terms of high selectivity for tau over amyloid, low white matter binding, and good in vivo kinetics. In addition, 11C-N-methyl lansoprazole and 18F-N-methyl lansoprazole showed potential for tau imaging in PSP as well as in AD patients [51].
Fig. 3.
Chemical structures of 11C- and 18F-labeled lansoprazole and astemizole derivatives
Table 1.
11C- and 18F-labeled astemizole and lansoprazole derivatives
| Radioligand | Kd (nM) | Log P | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Taua | Aβb | ||
| 18F-Labeled astemizole derivative [48] | Ki = 1.67 | – | 5.57 (Astemizole) |
| 18F-Lansoprazole [48, 51] | Kd = 3.3 | Kd = 11.0 | 1.47 |
|
11C-N-Methyl and 18F-N-Methyl lansoprazole [51] |
Kd = 0.7 | Kd = 8.2 | 2.18 |
aHuman tau 441
bMouse Aβ1–42
Arylquinoline derivatives are found to be selective for tau over Aβ fibrils (Table 2) [47]. The initially designed derivative, 6-(2-[18F]fluoroethoxy)-2-(4-aminophenyl)quinoline (18F-THK523) showed unfavorable kinetics in normal mouse brains (Fig. 4; Table 2). It also demonstrated high uptake in the white matter and had no tau-specific uptake in non-AD tauopathies [28]. Therefore, 18F-THK523 was chemically optimized to produce a series of other THK derivatives. 18F-THK5105 and 18F-THK5117 were found to bind to tau-rich regions, which was confirmed by co-localization with Gallyas-positive and immunoreactive tau protein deposits. 3H-THK5117 was shown to bind to NFTs in postmortem brain tissues, in a manner that was clearly distinguished from 3H-PIB retention [52]. Furthermore, PET studies demonstrated that both 18F-THK5105 and 18F-THK5117 retention in the inferior temporal cortex, a tau-rich region in brains of AD patients were greater than that of age-matched healthy controls based on regional standardized uptake value (SUV)-to-cerebellar cortex SUV ratio time activity curves [52, 53]. However, the pharmacokinetics of 18F-THK5105 was slower than that of 18F-THK5117 in normal mice and humans, which makes 18F-THK5117 a more favorable imaging agent [40, 52, 53]. 18F-THK5117 brain PET image of an AD patient was named “Image of the Year” at the 2014 annual meeting of the Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (http://www.snmmi.org). The recently developed 18F-THK5351 exhibited high binding affinity for AD hippocampal homogenates (Kd = 2.9 nM) and had faster kinetics in normal mice compared to 18F-THK5117. Furthermore, 18F-THK-5351 showed selective binding to tau and had a higher signal-to-background ratio on autoradiography of AD brain sections compared to other THK derivatives [29, 54]. PET images of patients with mild cognitive impairment showed 18F-THK-5351 retention in the same brain regions as detected in AD patients [55]. This radioligand is shown to be more specific and less non-specific than 18F-THK5117.
Table 2.
Tau-specific radioligands that have been evaluated in clinical PET studies of AD patients
| Radioligand | Kd (nM) | Mouse brain uptake at 2 min (% ID/g) | Mouse brain uptake ratio (2/30 min) | Log P | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tau | Aβ (Aβ/tau) | ||||
| 18F-DDNP [40, 46] | Kd1 = 36.7a | Kd1 = 5.52a
(0.15) |
6.23 | 2.02 | 3.71 |
| 18F-THK523 [40, 46] | Kd1 = 1.99a
Kd2 = 50.7a |
Kd1 = 30.3a
(15) |
2.72 | 1.85 | 2.40 |
| 18F-THK5105 [40] | Kd1 = 1.45a
Kd2 = 7.40a Kd = 2.63b |
Kd1 = 35.9a
(25) |
9.2 | 2.55 | 3.03 |
| 18F-THK5117 [40] | Ki = 10.5a
Kd = 5.19b |
– | 6.06 | 10.27 | 2.32 |
| 18F-THK5351 [54] | Kd = 2.9b | – | – | – | – |
| 11C-PBB3 [28, 56, 57] | Kd1 = 2.5b
Kd2 = 100b |
(40 ~ 50) | 1.92 (1 min) 0.97 (5 min) |
17.45 (1/30) 8.82 (5/30) |
3.30 (Calc.) |
| 18F-T807 [62] | Kd = 14.6b | (>27) | 4.43 (5 min) | 7.15 (5/30) | 1.67 |
| 18F-T808 [58, 61] | Kd = 22.0b | (27) | 6.7 (2.5 min) | 2.9 (2.5/20) | – |
aK18ΔK280-tau fibrils
bHuman brain sections
Fig. 4.
Chemical structures of tau-specific radioligands
Murayama et al. designed tau-specific radioligands by screening fluorescent chemicals that bind to β-sheet conformations in brains of AD and non-AD tauopathy patients as well as PS19 mice [56]. They developed a series of phenyl/pyridinyl butadienyl benzothiazoles/benzothiazoliums (PBBs) based on their finding that the lipophilicity and core length (15–18 Å) of ligands binding to β-sheets are major factors to determine their selectivity for tau over Aβ fibrils [43, 56]. Among these derivatives, 11C-PBB3 (Fig. 4) exhibited high and selective binding for tau over Aβ fibrils (Aβ/tau ratio = 40 ~ 50), and favorable kinetics in mouse brains (Table 2) [28, 43, 56]. PET studies showed that the radioligand was taken up by the tau-rich hippocampus of AD brains, whereas this region did not take up the Aβ imaging radioligand, 11C-PIB [39]. Although 11C-PBB3 undergoes photoisomerization in the presence of fluorescent light, its isomer is much less active. In addition, photoisomerization of the radioligand is readily preventable by removing fluorescent light [57].
Kolb et al. screened more than 900 compounds of different classes using a competitive autoradiography assay for binding to native tau and Aβ aggregates in AD brain tissue sections [58]. 5H-Pyrido[4,3-b]indole and benzo[4, 5]imidazo[1,2-a]pyrimidine derivatives, 18F-T807 and 18F-T808, (Fig. 4) were designed and synthesized [59–61]. The radioligands exhibited high binding affinity and selectivity for tau fibrils over Aβ fibrils (Table 2) and showed favorable kinetics in mice [58, 62]. The two radioligands had good pharmacokinetics in human studies with low radioactivity uptake in the white matter [58, 59, 61]. Furthermore, these radioligands were shown to bind to PHFs of tau in AD brains and their retention was associated with disease severity [59, 61]. Although 18F-T808 has better pharmacokinetics in rodents than 18F-T807 [58, 61, 62], it appeared to undergo slow metabolic defluorination in rodents and humans. This was also shown when 18F-T808 was incubated with mouse or human microsomes and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate (NADPH), which displayed metabolic instability that was more severe by mouse microsomes [58].
Challenges and Perspectives
It is more challenging to develop tau-specific imaging radioligands than Aβ plaque imaging radioligands, partly because of the intracellular location of tau proteins (Fig. 2). Furthermore, both tau protein and Aβ plaques have β-sheet conformations and co-exist in many regions in AD brains, which make it difficult to develop radioligands that bind exclusively to tau and not Aβ. In addition, tau proteins exist in much lower concentrations than Aβ plaques in brains with AD. However, clinical tau imaging has several advantages, including correlation of radioligand uptake with AD progression and the ability to also detect non-AD tauopathies. Current development of tau imaging radioligands is based on several lead compounds, each of which has strong and weak points. Further research will thus be important to design more optimal radiopharmaceuticals that allow early and accurate diagnosis of AD and non-AD tauopathies, as well as facilitate new drug development for AD treatment.
Acknowledgement
This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant (NRF-2011-0030164) and the Basic Science Research Program through the NRF (#2012R1A1A2041354) funded by the Korean government (MEST).
Conflict of Interest
Yearn Seong Choe and Kyung-Han Lee declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Statement
The study was approved by an institutional review board or equivalent and has been performed in accordance with the ethical standards laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments. This article does not contain any studies with humans or animals performed by any of the authors.
Footnotes
ᅟ
This manuscript has not been published previously and is not under consideration for publication elsewhere. All co-authors have approved the manuscript.
References
- 1.Bartus RT, Dean RL, Beer B, Lippa AS. The cholinergic hypothesis of geriatric memory dysfunction. Science. 1982;217:408–14. doi: 10.1126/science.7046051. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 2.Davies P, Maloney AJF. Selective loss of central cholinergic neurons in Alzheimer’s disease. Lancet. 1976;2:1403. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(76)91936-X. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 3.Bowen DM, Benton JS, Spillane JA, Smith CC, Allen SJ. Choline acetyltransferase activity and histopathology of frontal neocortex from biopsies of demented patients. J Neurol Sci. 1982;57:191–202. doi: 10.1016/0022-510X(82)90026-0. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 4.Geula C, Mesulam MM. Cholinergic systems and related neuropathological predilection patterns in Alzheimer disease. In: Terry RD, Katzman R, Back KL, editors. Alzheimer disease. New York: Raven; 1994. pp. 263–91. [Google Scholar]
- 5.Davis KL, Mohs RC, Marin D, Purohit DP, Perl DP, Lantz M, et al. Cholinergic markers in elderly patients with early signs of Alzheimer disease. JAMA. 1999;281:1401–6. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.15.1401. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 6.Doody RS, Dunn JK, Clark CM, Farlow M, Foster NL, Liao T, et al. Chronic donepezil treatment is associated with slowed cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2001;12:295–300. doi: 10.1159/000051272. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 7.Courtney C, Farrell D, Gray R, Hills R, Lynch L, Sellwood E, et al. AD2000 Collaborative Group. Long-term donepezil treatment in 565 patients with Alzheimer’s disease (AD2000): randomised double-blind trial. Lancet. 2004;363:2105–15. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(04)16499-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 8.Craig LA, Hong NS, McDonald RJ. Revisiting the cholinergic hypothesis in the development of Alzheimer’s disease. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35:1397–409. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2011.03.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 9.Irie T, Fukushi K, Akimoto Y, Tamagami H, Nozaki T. Design and evaluation of radioactive acetylcholine analog for mapping brain acetylcholinesterase (AChE) in vivo. Nucl Med Biol. 1994;21:801–8. doi: 10.1016/0969-8051(94)90159-7. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 10.Kilbourn MR, Snyder SE, Sherman PS, Kuhl DE. In vivo studies of acetylcholinesterase activity using a labeled substrate, N-[11C]methylpiperidin-4-yl propionate ([11C]PMP) Synapse. 1996;22:123–31. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1098-2396(199602)22:2<123::AID-SYN5>3.0.CO;2-F. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 11.Namba H, Irie T, Fukushi K, Iyo M. In vivo measurement of acetylcholinesterase activity in the brain with a radioactive acetylcholine analog. Brain Res. 1994;667:278–82. doi: 10.1016/0006-8993(94)91507-5. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 12.Musachio JL, Flesher JE, Scheffel U, Rauseo P, Hilton J, Mathews WB, et al. Radiosynthesis and mouse brain distribution studies of [11C] CP-126,998: a PET ligand for in vivo study of acetylcholinesterase. Nucl Med Biol. 2002;29:547–52. doi: 10.1016/S0969-8051(02)00299-8. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 13.Bencherif B, Endres CJ, Musachio JL, Villalobos A, Hilton J, Scheffel U, et al. PET imaging of brain acetylcholinesterase using [11C]CP-126,998, a brain selective enzyme inhibitor. Synapse. 2002;45:1–9. doi: 10.1002/syn.10072. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 14.Lee SY, Choe YS, Kim YR, Paik JY, Choi BW, Kim SE, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 5,7-dihydro-3-(2-(1-(4-[18F]fluorobenzyl)-4-piperidinyl)ethyl)-6H-pyrrolo(3,2-f)-1,2-benzisoxazol-6-one for in vivo mapping of acetylcholinesterase. Nucl Med Commun. 2004;25:591–6. doi: 10.1097/01.mnm.0000126629.09543.1d. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 15.Ryu EK, Choe YS, Park EY, Paik JY, Kim YR, Lee KH, et al. Synthesis and evaluation of 2-[18F]fluoro-CP-118,954 for the in vivo mapping of acetylcholinesterase. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:185–91. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2004.09.006. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 16.Karran E, Mercken M, De Strooper B. The amyloid cascade hypothesis for Alzheimer’s disease: an appraisal for the development of therapeutics. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2011;10:698–712. doi: 10.1038/nrd3505. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 17.Mathis CA, Wang Y, Holt DP, Huang GF, Debnath ML, Klunk WE. Synthesis and evaluation of 11C-labeled 6-substituted 2-arylbenzothiazoles as amyloid imaging agents. J Med Chem. 2003;46:2740–54. doi: 10.1021/jm030026b. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 18.Rowe CC, Ng S, Ackermann U, Gong SJ, Pike K, Savage G, et al. Imaging β-amyloid burden in aging and dementia. Neurology. 2007;68:1718–25. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000261919.22630.ea. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 19.Zhang W, Kung MP, Oya S, Hou C’, Kung HF. 18F-Labeld styrylpyridines as PET agents for amyloid plaque imaging. Nucl Med Biol. 2007;34:89–97. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2006.10.003. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 20.Kung HF, Choi SR, Qu W, Zhang W, Skovronsky D. 18F Stilbenes and styrylpyridines for PET imaging of Aβ plaques in Alzheimer’s disease: a miniperspective. J Med Chem. 2010;53:933–41. doi: 10.1021/jm901039z. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 21.Clark CM, Schneider JA, Mintun MA, Bedell BJ, Beach TG, Sadowsky CH, et al. Phase III trial results for the amyoid PET imaging agent Florbetapir F 18 (18F-AV-45): imaging to histopathologic correlations in an end-of-life human subject study. Alzheimers Dement. 2010;6:S71. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2010.05.211. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 22.Zhang W, Kung MP, Hou C, Marier DL, Kung HF. F-18 Polyethylene glycol stilbenes as PET imaging agents targeting Aβ aggregates in the brain. Nucl Med Biol. 2005;32:799–809. doi: 10.1016/j.nucmedbio.2005.06.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 23.Rowe CC, Ackerman U, Browne W, Mulligan R, Pike KL, O’Keefe G, et al. Imaging of amyloid β in Alzheimer’s disease with 18F-BAY94-9172, a novel PET tracer: proof of mechanism. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7:129–35. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(08)70001-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 24.Sabri O, Sabbagh MN, Seibyl J, Barthel H, Akatsu H, Ouchi Y, et al. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimers Dement. 2015;11:964–74. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.004. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 25.Koole M, Lewis DM, Buckley C, Nelissen N, Vandenbulcke M, Brooks DJ, et al. Whole-body biodistribution and radiation dosimetry of 18F-GE067: a radioligand for in vivo brain amyloid imaging. J Nucl Med. 2009;50:818–22. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.060756. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 26.Curtis C, Gamez JE, Singh U, Sadowsky H, Villena T, Sabbagh MN, et al. Phase 3 trial of flutemetamol labeled with radioactive fluorine 18 imaging and neuritic plaque density. JAMA Neurol. 2015;72:287–94. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2014.4144. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 27.Ghoshal N, García-Sierra F, Wuu J, Leurgans S, Bennett DA, et al. Tau conformational changes correspond to impairments of episodic memory in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease. Exp Neurol. 2002;177:475–93. doi: 10.1006/exnr.2002.8014. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 28.Shah M, Catafau AM. Molecular imaging insights into neurodegeneration: focus on tau PET radiotracers. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:871–4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.113.136069. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 29.Villemagne VL, Fodero-Tavoletti MT, Masters CL, Rowe CC. Tau imaging: early progress and future directions. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:114–24. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(14)70252-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 30.Ittner LM, Götz J. Amyloid-β and tau — a toxic pas de deux in Alzheimer’s disease. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;12:67–72. doi: 10.1038/nrn2967. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 31.Goedert M, Spillantini MG, Cairns NJ, Crowther RA. Tau proteins of Alzheimer paired helical filaments: abnormal phosphorylation of all six brain isoforms. Neuron. 1992;8:159–68. doi: 10.1016/0896-6273(92)90117-V. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 32.Lee VMY, Goedert M, Trojanowski JQ. Neurodegenerative tauopathies. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:1121–59. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.1121. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 33.Chen-Plotkin AS, Lee VMY, Trojanowski JQ. TAR DNA-binding protein 43 in neurodegenerative disease. Nat Rev Neurol. 2010;6:211–20. doi: 10.1038/nrneurol.2010.18. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 34.Rabinovici GD, Miller BL. Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis and management. CNS Drugs. 2010;24:375–98. doi: 10.2165/11533100-000000000-00000. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 35.Seelaar H, Rohrer JD, Pijnenburg YA, Fox NC, van Swieten JC. Clinical, genetic and pathological heterogeneity of frontotemporal dementia: a review. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2011;82:476–86. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2010.212225. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 36.Sunde M, Serpell LC, Bartlam M, Fraser PE, Pepys MB, Blake CC. Common core structure of amyloid fibrils by synchrotron X-ray diffraction. J Mol Biol. 1997;273:729–39. doi: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1348. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 37.Lührs T, Ritter C, Adrian M, Riek-Loher D, Bohrmann B, Döbeli H, et al. 3D structure of Alzheimer’s amyloid-β(1–42) fibrils. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102:17342–7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0506723102. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 38.Scheidt HA, Huster D, Rothemund I, Morgado S. Dynamics of amyloid fibrils revealed by solid-state NMR. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:2017–21. doi: 10.1074/jbc.M111.308619. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 39.Daebel V, Chinnathambi S, Biernat J, Schwalbe M, Habenstein B, Loquet A, et al. β-Sheet core of tau paired helical filaments revealed by solid-state NMR. J Am Chem Soc. 2012;134:13982–9. doi: 10.1021/ja305470p. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 40.Okamura N, Furumoto S, Harada R, Tago T, Yoshikawa T, Fodero-Tavoletti M, et al. Novel 18F-labeled arylquinoline derivatives for noninvasive imaging of tau pathology in Alzheimer disease. J Nucl Med. 2013;54:1420–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.112.117341. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 41.Mukaetova-Ladinska EB, Harrington CR, Roth M, Wischik CM. Biochemical and anatomical redistribution of tau protein in Alzheimer’s disease. Am J Pathol. 1993;143:565–78. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 42.Näslund J, Haroutunian V, Mohs R, Davis KL, Davies P, Greengard P, et al. Correlation between elevated levels of amyloid beta-peptide in the brain and cognitive decline. JAMA. 2000;283:1571–7. doi: 10.1001/jama.283.12.1571. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 43.Mathis CA, Klunk WE. Imaging tau deposits in vivo: progress in viewing more of the proteopathy picture. Neuron. 2013;79:1035–7. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.09.001. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 44.Barrio JR, Huang SC, Cole G, Satyamurthy N, Petric A, Phelps ME, et al. PET imaging of tangles and plaques in Alzheimer disease with a highly hydrophobic probe. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 1999;42:S194–5. [Google Scholar]
- 45.Agdeppa ED, Kepe V, Liu J, Flores-Torres S, Satyamurthy N, Petric A, et al. Binding characteristics of radiofluorinated 6-dialkylamino-2-naphthaylethylidene derivatives as positron emission tomography imaging probes of β-amyloid plaques in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2001;21:RC189. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.21-24-j0004.2001. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 46.Harada R, Okamura N, Furumoto S, Tago T, Maruyama M, Higuchi M, et al. Comparison of the binding characteristics of [18F]THK-523 and other amyloid imaging tracers to Alzheimer’s disease pathology. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2013;40:125–32. doi: 10.1007/s00259-012-2261-2. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 47.Okamura N, Suemoto T, Furumoto S, Suzuki M, Shimadzu H, Akatsu H, et al. Quinoline and benzimidazole derivatives: candidate probes for in vivo imaging of tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. J Neurosci. 2005;25:10857–62. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1738-05.2005. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 48.Rojo LE, Alzate-Morales J, Saavedra IN, Davies P, Maccioni RB. Selective interaction of lansoprazole and astemizole with tau polymers: potential new clinical use in diagnosis of Alzheimer’s disease. J Alzheimers Dis. 2010;19:573–89. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2010-1262. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 49.Riss PJ, Brichard L, Ferrari V, Williamson DJ, Fryer TD, Hong YT, et al. Radiosynthesis and characterization of astemizole derivatives as lead compounds toward PET imaging of τ-pathology. Med Chem Commun. 2013;4:852–5. doi: 10.1039/c3md00017f. [DOI] [Google Scholar]
- 50.Shao X, Carpenter GM, Desmond TJ, Sherman P, Quesada CA, Maria Fawaz M, et al. Evaluation of [11C]N-methyl lansoprazole as a radiopharmaceutical for PET imaging of tau neurofibrillary tangles. ACS Med Chem Lett. 2012;3:936–41. doi: 10.1021/ml300216t. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 51.Fawaz MV, Brooks AF, Rodnick ME, Carpenter GM, Shao X, Desmond TJ, et al. High affinity radiopharmaceuticals based upon lansoprazole for PET imaging of aggregated tau in Alzheimer’s disease and progressive supranuclear palsy: Synthesis, preclinical evaluation, and lead selection. ACS Chem Neurosci. 2014;5:718–30. doi: 10.1021/cn500103u. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 52.Harada R, Okamura N, Furumoto S, Furukawa K, Ishiki A, Tomita N, et al. [18F]THK-5117 PET for assessing neurofibrillary pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2015;42:1052–61. doi: 10.1007/s00259-015-3035-4. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 53.Okamura N, Furumoto S, Fodero-Tavoletti MT, Mulligan RS, Harada R, Yates P, et al. Non-invasive assessment of Alzheimer’s disease neurofibrillary pathology using 18F-THK5105 PET. Brain. 2014;137:1762–71. doi: 10.1093/brain/awu064. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 54.Okamura N, Furumoto S, Harada R, Tago T, Iwata R, Tashiro M, et al. Characterization of 18F-THK-5351, a novel PET tracer for imaging tau pathology in Alzheimer’s disease. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2014;41(Suppl 2):260. [Google Scholar]
- 55.Okamura N, Furumoto S, Furukawa K, Ishiki A, Harada R, Iwata R, et al. PET imaging of tau pathology in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer’s disease with [18F]THK-5351. J Nucl Med. 2015;56(Suppl 3):138. [Google Scholar]
- 56.Maruyama M, Shimada H, Suhara T, Shinotoh H, Ji B, Maeda J, et al. Imaging of tau pathology in a tauopathy mouse model and in Alzheimer patients compared to normal controls. Neuron. 2013;79:1094–108. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2013.07.037. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 57.Hashimoto H, Kawamura K, Igarashi N, Takei M, Fujishiro T, Aihara Y, et al. Radiosynthesis, photoisomerization, biodistribution, and metabolite analysis of 11C-PBB3 as a clinically useful PET probe for imaging of tau pathology. J Nucl Med. 2014;55:1–7. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.114.139550. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 58.Zhang W, Arteaga J, Cashion DK, Chen G, Gangadharmath U, Gomez LF, et al. A highly selective and specific PET tracer for imaging of tau pathologies. J Alzheimers Dis. 2012;31:601–12. doi: 10.3233/JAD-2012-120712. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 59.Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK, Walsh JC, Mu F, Su MY, et al. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T807. J Alzheimers Dis. 2013;34:457–68. doi: 10.3233/JAD-122059. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 60.Shoup TM, Yokell DL, Rice PA, Jackson RN, Livni E, Johnson KA, et al. A concise radiosynthesis of the tau radiopharmaceutical, [18F]T807. J Label Compd Radiopharm. 2013;56:736–40. doi: 10.1002/jlcr.3098. [DOI] [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 61.Chien DT, Bahri S, Szardenings AK, Walsh JC, Mu F, Su MY, et al. Early clinical PET imaging results with the novel PHF-tau radioligand [F-18]-T808. J Alzheimers Dis. 2014;38:171–84. doi: 10.3233/JAD-130098. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
- 62.Xia CF, Arteaga J, Chen G, Gangadharmath U, Gomez LF, Kasi D, et al. [18F]T807, a novel tau positron emission tomography imaging agent for Alzheimer’s disease. Alzheimers Dement. 2013;9:666–76. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.008. [DOI] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]



