Table 3.
Low fidelity (N = 46), frequency (%) | High fidelity (N = 47), frequency (%) | ||
---|---|---|---|
Did you get enough time to practice? | No | 2 (4.35) | 9 (19.15) |
Yes | 44 (95.65) | 38 (80.85) | |
Would you have preferred to be in another group? | No | 24 (52.17) | 35 (74.47) |
Yes | 22 (47.83) | 12 (25.53) | |
Were the instructors helpful? | No | 2 (4.35) | 1 (2.13) |
Yes | 44 (95.65) | 46 (97.87) | |
Do you think that you will be able to independently take care of a newborn with difficulty of breathing at birth? | May be | 0 (0) | 1 (2.13) |
No | 11 (23.91) | 9 (19.15) | |
Yes | 35 (76.09) | 37 (78.72) | |
Do you think that this course improves your ability to help a more skilled person during the resuscitation of a newborn with breathing difficulty? | No | 2 (4.35) | 3 (6.38) |
Yes | 44 (95.65) | 44 (93.62) | |
Would you be interested in doing the course again? | No | 18 (39.13) | 22 (46.81) |
Yes | 28 (60.87) | 25 (53.19) | |
Would you recommend this course to your juniors? | No | 2 (4.35) | 2 (4.26) |
Yes | 44 (95.65) | 45 (95.74) | |
In terms of learning neonatal resuscitation how useful would it be to you in your medical career (in terms of helping babies)? | <5 % | 0 (0) | 1 (2.13) |
>85 % | 14 (30.43) | 8 (17.02) | |
05–20 % | 2 (4.35) | 2 (4.26) | |
20–50 % | 12 (26.09) | 17 (36.17) | |
50–70 % | 11 (23.91) | 8 (17.02) | |
70–85 % | 7 (15.22) | 11 (23.40) |
Italic values indicate statistically significant associations