Skip to main content
. 2015 Sep-Oct;90(5):707–721. doi: 10.1590/abd1806-4841.20153605

Table 1.

Characteristics of studies selected for research

  Author/ year Objective Sample / Groups Endpoint variable
1. Shapiro et al., 201216 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles. 37 subjects/ women/ 36 a 65 years. (No control group) Wrinkles.
2. Abrahan et al. , 200417 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles and laxity. 35 subjects/ 28 women and 7 men/ 35 to 65 years.(no control group) Wrinkles and laxity.
3. Rusciani et al. , 200718 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 93 subjects/ 83 women and 10 men/ mean 53,3 years.(no control group) Laxity.
4. Hsu et al.,200319 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 16 subjects/ 15 women and 1 men/ 43 to 73 years(no control group) Laxity.
5. Harth et al., 201012 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 30 subjects/ gender not mentioned/ age not mentioned (no control group) Laxity.
6. Bassichis et al., 200420 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 36 subjects/ experimental group: 24 (23 women and 1 men; control group: 12 (gender not mentioned)/ age not mentioned Forehead height .
7. Lee et al., 20116 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF signals in photoaging (wrinkles, pigmentation, telangiectasia, laxity) 26 subjects/ 26 women/ mean 56 years(No control group) Laxity, brightness and degree of elasticity.
8. El-Domyati et al., 201121 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles. 6 subjects/ 6 women/ 47 to 62 years (No control group) Wrinkles. Elastin and collagen quantity.
9. Javate et al., 201122 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles. 32 subjectsa/ 28 women and 4 men/ 29 to 71 years (no control group) Wrinkles. Collagen quantity.
10. Friedman et al., 200723 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles and laxity. 16 subjects/ 16 women/ 29 to 66 years (No control group) Wrinkles and laxity.
11. Fitzpatrick et al. , 200324 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles and laxity. 86 subjects/ 79 women and 7 men/ 35 to 70 years (no control group) Wrinkles and laxity.
12. Alster et al. , 200425 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of wrinkles and laxity. 50 subjects/ gender not mentioned/ mean 53,3 years(No control group) Wrinkles and laxity.
13. Carruthers and Carru-thers, 200726 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 20 subjects /17 women and 3 men/ age not mentioned (No control group) Laxity.
14. Finzi and Spangler, 200527 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity and wrinkles. 25 subjects/ 24 women and 1 men/ 33 to 68 years (no control group) Laxity and wrinkles.
15. Kushikata et al. , 200528 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 85 subjects/ 85 women/ 31 to 68 years (no control group) Laxity.
16. Levenberg, 201029 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity, wrinkles and fat. 37 subjects/ women/ 23 to 82 years (No control group) Wrinkles, Laxity and localized fat.
  Instrument Result Justification PEDro/ Level of evidence
1. Pictures. Decrease in wrinkles. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
2. Objective measurement of forehead height. Satisfaction questionnaire. Pictures. Decrease in wrinkles and laxity. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
3. Pictures. Decrease in skin laxity. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
4. Pictures. Satisfaction questionnaire. No significant change. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
5. Pictures. Fitzpatrick scale. Decrease in skin laxity. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
6. Satisfaction questionnaire. Pictures. Brow's measurement. Forehead height reduction. Positive statistical difference. Client dissatisfaction. Thermal injury leads to the production of collagen . 4/ Limitada evidencia.
7. Pictures. Medical evaluation. Scale of subjective improvement. Patient satisfaction . Decrease in laxity, increased brightness and skin elasticity. Positive statistical difference. Thermal injury . 2/ Insufficient evidence.
8. Pictures. Skin biopsy. Decrease in wrinkles and increased collagen. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
9. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Histological analysis. Fitzpatrick scale Decrease in wrinkles. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
10. Pictures. Decrease in wrinkles and laxity. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
11. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Fitzpatrick scale. Decrease in wrinkles and laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 4/ Limitada evidencia.
12. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Decrease in wrinkles laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
13.. Pictures. Patient satisfaction Decrease in laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 4/ Limitada evidencia.
14. Pictures. Decrease in wrinkles and laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
15. Pictures. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis.    
16. Pictures. Circumference measurements Decreased laxity, wrinkles and localized fat. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
  Author/ year Objective Sample / Groups Endpoint variable
17. Montesi et al., 200730 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 30 subjects/ 26 women and 4 men/ 18 to 70 years (no control group) Laxity and wrinkles and collagen quantity.
18. Nahm et al., 200431 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 10 subjects/ 9 women and 1 men/ 39 to 62 years(no control group) Laxity.
19. Narins and Narins, 200332 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 17 subjects/ 17 women/ 42 to 60 years (No control group) Laxity.
20. Ruiz-Esparza and Gomez, 200333 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 15 subjects/ 15 women/ 41 to 68 years (No control group) Laxity.
21. Uwe Wollina, 201134 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 20 subjects/ 20 women/ 34 to 73 years (No control group) Laxity.
22. Bogle et al., 200735 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 66 subjects/ 66 women/ mean 35 years. (No control group) Laxity.
23. Fritz et al., 200436 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 20 subjects/ 20 women/ 40 to 63 years. (No control group) Laxity.
24. Esparza et al. , 200437 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity and wrinkles. 20 subjects/ 20 women/ 42 to 67 years. (No control group) Laxity and wrinkles.
25. Kaplan et al. , 200938 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF in fat reduction and collagen regeneration. 12 subjects/ 12 women/ 34 to 65 years. (No control group) Laxity, localized fat and collagen quantity.
26. Chipps et al., 201339 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity and wrinkles. 49 subjects/ 45 women and 4 men/ 30 to 70 years.(no control group) Laxity and wrinkles.
27. Edwards et al., 201340 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 64 subjects(no control group) Laxity.
28. Suh et al.,201341 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity and wrinkles 8 subjects/7 women and 1 men (No control group) Laxity and wrinkles.
29. Taub et al., 201242 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity and wrinkles. 17 subjects/ gender not mentioned/ age not mentioned. (No control group) Laxity and wrinkles.
30. Tay and Kwok, 200943 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity and wrinkles. 6 subjects/ 6 women/ 30 to 60 years. (No control group) Laxity and wrinkles.
31. Vega et al., 201344 To evaluate the effectiveness of RF for the treatment of laxity. 31subjects/ 31 women/ 40 to 65 years (No control group) Laxity.
  Instrument Result Justification PEDro/ Level of evidence
17. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Biopsy. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
18. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Decreased laxity. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
19. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
20. Pictures. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
21. Picture. Patient satisfaction. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
22. Pictures. Laxity rating. BTC2000 device (skin rigidity and energy absorption). Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
23. Pictures. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
24. Patient satisfaction. Quality of life questionnaires. Decreased laxity and wrinkles. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence.
25. Pictures. Decreased laxity, localized fat and increased collagen No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence.
26. Pictures. Patient satisfaction. Quality of life questionnaires. Decreased laxity and das wrinkles. Positive statistical difference. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence
27. Pictures. Patient satisfaction questionnaire. Decreased laxity. Positive statistical difference Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence
28.. Picture. Pictures. Satisfaction questionnaire. Glogau classification Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence
29. Pictures. Satisfaction scale. Decreased laxity and wrinkles. Positive statistical difference Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 3/ Insufficient evidence
30.. Pictures. Patient satisfaction Decreased laxity and wrinkles. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence
31. Pictures. Global esthetic improvement. Decreased laxity. No statistical analysis. Thermal effect leads to production of collagen. 2/ Insufficient evidence