Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug 7;213(5):668.e1–668.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.002

Table 4.

total number of cells, percent of positive cells and ratio of m2/m1 macrophages seen in a 20× field (fiber)

Total Number of Cells, Percent of Positive Cells and Ratio of M2/M1
Macrophages in a 20× Field (Fiber)
Treatment Total
Number of
Cells		 % of M1
Positive Cells		 % of M2
Positive Cells		 Ratio
M2/M1
Sham 696±370 b0.8±0.7 b0.1±0.0 -
Gynemesh 642±215 6.8±2.8 3.5±2.2 c0.52±0.14
UltraPro 768±232 7.3±2.6 4.6±1.5 0.66±0.08
Restorelle 610±291 7.0±3.7 4.6±2.1 0.67±0.09
P valuea 0.700 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001
a

Comparison of p-value among groups, significant difference if p<0.05;

b

Significance seen between Sham and Gynemesh, Sham and UltraPro and Sham and Restorelle;

c

Significance seen between Gynemesh and UltraPro and Gynemesh and Restorelle