Skip to main content
. Author manuscript; available in PMC: 2016 Nov 1.
Published in final edited form as: Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Aug 7;213(5):668.e1–668.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2015.08.002

Table 5.

Total number of cells, percent of positive cells and ratio of m2/m1 macrophages seen in a 20× field (knot)

Total Number of Cells, Percent of Positive Cells and Ratio of M2/M1
Macrophages in a 20× Field (Knot)

Treatment Total
Number of
Cells
% of M1
Positive Cells
% of M2
Positive Cells
Ratio
M2/M1
Sham 679±327 a0.1±0.1 a0.1±0.0 -
Gynemesh 630±230 8.3±4.7 4.4±2.3 0.57±0.11
UltraPro 722±214 9.2±2.8 5.3±1.0 0.61±0.18
Restorelle 575±104 8.4±2.6 4.9±1.8 0.60±0.11
P valuee 0.620 <0.001 <0.001 <0.001

aComparison of p-value among groups, significant difference if p<0.05;

a

Significance seen between Sham and Gynemesh, Sham and UltraPro and Sham and Restorelle