Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;9:428. doi: 10.3389/fncel.2015.00428

Table 3.

Classification of thalamic nuclei for correlation analysis.

Scheme Motor/high Intermediate Sensory/low Mean r2 p < 0.05 Minimum (log) Maximum Mean
1 VL VB, PoM, MD LGN, MGv, LP, MGd 0.39 8 of 9 -16 0.07 0.02
2 VL VB, PoM, MD, LP, MGd LGN, MGv 0.38 8 of 9 -14 0.07 0.02
3 VL PoM, MD, LP, MGd LGN, MGv, VB 0.27 7 of 9 -14 0.40 0.08
4 VL, MD LGN, MGv, VB, PoM, MGd, LP 0.22 6 of 9 -11 0.42 0.11
5 MD, PoM, MGd, LP LGN, MGv, VB, VL 0.02 1 of 6 -2 0.84 0.45
6 VL, MD, PoM, MGd, LP LGN, MGv, VB 0.20 6 of 9 -7 0.42 0.11
7 MD, PoM, MGd, LP VL LGN, MGv, VB 0.14 4 of 9 -5 0.71 0.21

Correlation analysis was performed between each of the seven classification schemes and nine data sets of Figure 9 (except six data sets for scheme 5, since only VL, LGN, and VB were recorded in aEPSG experiments and they are all classed as ‘lower’). Schemes are ‘distance from motor output’ (1–2), the conventional sensory-motor distinction (3–4), and high–low (5–7). Statistics are the mean correlation coefficient, number of p-values below threshold for significance, and minimum, maximum, and mean p-values. Mean values are not actually values of r2 and p, but they can be compared to one another. We present them as a crude but concise summary.