Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;5:16067. doi: 10.1038/srep16067

Table 2. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses of the association of the prognosis with the clinicopathological parameters and GRP78 expression in PDAC.

Variable No. of cases Univariate analysis Multivariate analysis
Median ± SE 95% CI p value# RR 95% CI p value*
Age (years)       0.9272      
 ≥65 53 11 ± 2 7–15        
 <65 107 13 ± 1 10–15        
Gender       0.0075     0.041
 Male 104 11 ± 1 9–13   1.617 1.017–2.187  
 Female 56 14 ± 5 5–24   1    
Tumor location       0.4050      
  95 13 ± 1 10–16        
  60 11 ± 1 8–14        
Tumor size       0.9543      
 >4 cm 94 13 ± 1 10–16        
 ≤4 cm 69 11 ± 1 8–14        
Histological grade       0.0150     0.013
 G1–2 108 14 ± 2 9–19   1    
 G3 36 9 ± 1 7–11   1.696 1.116–2.576  
 pT stage       0.0139     0.036
 T1–2 94 13 ± 4 6–20   1    
 T3–4 64 11 ± 2 8–14   1.508 1.026–2.514  
pN stage       0.0778      
 N0 91 15 ± 3 10–20        
 N1 62 10 ± 2 7–13        
Perineural invasion       0.0455     0.348
 Positive 77 11 ± 1 9–13   1.204 0.817–1.776  
 Negative 81 15 ± 3 9–21   1    
GRP78 in tumor       0.0077     0.041
 High 72 11 ± 1 8–14   1.491 1.017–2.187  
 Low 88 13 ± 4 6–20   1    

Note: The boldface type indicates a significant difference. PDAC, pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; SE, standard error; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; G1, well differentiated; G2, moderately differentiated; G3, poorly differentiated; T, tumor; N, lymph node. #Log-rank test; *Cox regression test.