Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;14:147. doi: 10.1186/s12933-015-0311-3

Table 6.

Risk of progression of Coronary Calcium Score according to pulse pressure and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity odds ratioa (95 % CI) of CAC change >0 by PWV50 % and pulse pressure 50 %

Number Cases Age and sex-adjusted ORa (95 % CI) Multivariate-adjusted ORa (95 % CI)
Model 1 Model 2
Pulse pressure
 Pulse pressure <50 % 574 159 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 Pulse pressure ≥50 % 550 159 1.01 (0.77–1.32) 0.91 (0.68–1.21) 0.90 (0.63–1.28)
Pulse Pressure and Pulse Wave Velocity
 PWV <50 % and pulse pressure <50 % 322 66 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference) 1.00 (reference)
 PWV <50 % and pulse pressure ≥50 % 240 44 0.90 (0.58–1.39) 0.85 (0.54–1.33) 0.90 (0.55–1.46)
 PWV ≥50 % and pulse pressure <50 % 252 93 2.01 (1.37–2.95) 1.82 (1.22–2.72) 1.88 (1.26–2.82)
 PWV ≥50 % and pulse pressure ≥50 % 310 115 1.88 (1.30–2.72) 1.57 (1.06–2.32) 1.75 (1.09–2.80)
 P for trend <0.001 0.002 <0.001

OR odds ratio, CI confidence interval

aEstimated from logistic regression. Multivariable model 1 was adjusted for age, sex, center, year of screening exam, smoking status, alcohol intake, educational level, BMI, diabetes, hypertension, HDL, LDL and glucose; model 2: model 1 plus adjustment for sbp and heart rate