Skip to main content
. 2015 Nov 4;14:141. doi: 10.1186/s12944-015-0145-8

Table 3.

Antioxidant Potential of essential oils from Polygonum hydropiper leaves and flowers

Samples DPPH free radical scavenging ABTS free radical scavenging H2O2 free radical scavenging
Conc. μg/ml % inhibition IC50 % inhibition IC50 % inhibition IC50
Essential oils from leaves (Ph.LO) 12.5 37.95 ± 0.29*** 20 9.66 ± 1.33ns 180 25.66 ± 0.66 ns 60
25 46.66 ± 0.72ns 13.00 ± 1.15 ns 33.16 ± 1.01 ns
50 53.50 ± 0.86ns 25.66 ± 2.18 ns 42.50 ± 0.28 ns
100 60.66 ± 0.92* 27.50 ± 0.28 ns 47.50 ± 1.04 ns
200 65.16 ± 0.60* 42.66 ± 0.92 ns 58.00 ± 0.28 ns
400 72.00 ± 1.04*** 58.16 ± 1.09* 65.16 ± 1.96 ns
800 79.50 ± 0.28*** 73.16 ± 1.01*** 70.66 ± 0.88 ns
1000 85.00 ± 1.15** 89.00 ± 0.50*** 79.00 ± 1.00***
Essential oils from Flower (Ph.FO) 12.5 22.83 ± 0.72*** 200 30.00 ± 0.00 ns 45 21.83 ± 0.60 ns 50
25 28.00 ± 0.57*** 38.50 ± 0.86 ns 32.00 ± 2.30 ns
50 35.83 ± 0.60*** 45.16 ± 0.60 ns 40.83 ± 0.92 ns
100 42.33 ± 0.44*** 51.33 ± 0.66 ns 49.83 ± 0.44 ns
200 47.33 ± 1.30*** 66.00 ± 1.15 ns 58.50 ± 0.76 ns
400 54.83 ± 2.92*** 72.00 ± 0.86 ns 64.00 ± 0.00 ns
800 70.16 ± 0.60*** 78.66 ± 0.88*** 71.66 ± 3.17*
1000 81.33 ± 0.72*** 87.33 ± 1.76*** 77.16 ± 0.44***
Ascorbic Acid (Positive control) 12.5 45.00 ± 0.50 5 49.16 ± 0.60 10 46.66 ± 0.72 7
25 47.33 ± 1.30 56.50 ± 1.04 55. 16 ± 0.60
50 54.88 ± 1.30 63.16 ± 1.01 63.00 ± 0.00
100 63.00 ± 1.15 70.00 ± 0.00 68.58 ± 0.69
200 68.36 ± 0.57 75.45 ± 0.65 71.44 ± 0.58
400 79.85 ± 2.24 81.37 ± 0.64 76.45 ± 0.77
800 87.08 ± 0.47 88.37 ± 0.54 84.36 ± 0.64
1000 91.90 ± 0.96 94.30 ± 0.61 89.37 ± 0.65

Each value represent mean ± S.E.M of three independent experimental results. Values significantly different when compared to slandered drug (Ascorbic acid) at the same concentration i.e. *: P < 0.05, **: P < 0.01 and ***: P < 0.001. ns: Values not significantly different in comparison to P. control